3 at the Back

[Harry_SFC]

Just seen a post on "X" saying that 3 of the SR clubs play 3 at the back. Just a coincidence of course. 

Edited 6 hours ago by Harry_SFC

[Saint Fan CaM]

2 minutes ago, Harry_SFC said:

Just seen a post on "X" saying that all 4 SR clubs play 3 at the back. Just a coincidence of course. 

Of course they do - it ensures the key performance metric for the spreadsheets is possession % is high.

[Osvaldorama]

It’s horrific 

 

Doesn’t suit the players. Doesn’t make us better.
 

Makes for boring games. 
 

Can’t stand it. Let alone playing it regardless of what happens on the pitch, against any opposition. 

[disconnect]

Aside from the convenient clean sheet yesterday, there was the argument previously that we need an extra centre back as we concede too many goals. How about trying to score more goals too? Most of the time the centre backs are just strolling into each others way and it clearly isn't working as we're still conceding and not scoring enough (despite dominating possession most matches). It was forgivable when the players were obviously trying to win once Still went, but now they seem completely settled back into this terrible passive rubbish.