Jump to content

The Burnham Years - Can the new(ish) broom sweep clean?


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, iansums said:

What does amaze me is how many people WFH in recent weeks when we've had this heat wave. We are lucky enough to have really good AC in the office and some people choose to WFH in an oven, they can't be working efficiently.

In weather like this I miss the computer rooms at work.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, hypochondriac said:

At least he's binned Lammy. If he does nothing else good that's an undeniable positive.

As soon as I saw that on BBC News just now, I thought ‘I know someone who will be pleased with that’! 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, egg said:

Peter Kyle as chancellor though. Hmm.

 

Sacked as Business Secretary and seemingly out of the cabinet, as is Lammy, Steve Reed, Liz Kendall and Lord Hermer. Reeves turned down one of the other big cabinet offices.

Mahmood and Miliband just gone in there, Mahmood as CofE has been the chatter. John Healey went into No10 before them. 

Edited by Gloucester Saint
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

As soon as I saw that on BBC News just now, I thought ‘I know someone who will be pleased with that’! 

Ha. Possibly my most hated man in politics at present. I can't think of anything he has tried to introduce or proposed that I don't think is a dumb idea. God willing he's never in a position of influence ever again. Absolutely no idea what Burnham will be like but he's saying the right things and a more collegiate approach is to be welcomed. You always got the impression that Starmer viewed those who disagreed with him as beneath contempt. 

Edited by hypochondriac
Posted
33 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Sacked as Business Secretary and seemingly out of the cabinet, as is Lammy, Steve Reed, Liz Kendall and Lord Hermer. Reeves turned down one of the other big cabinet offices.

Mahmood and Miliband just gone in there, Mahmood as CofE has been the chatter. John Healey went into No10 before them. 

Kyle was 1/100 this morning to be Chancellor. Odds like that suggested it was done and leaked. Not sure what's happened, of anything. I said I was expecting a few curveballs, but Healey is Chancellor is proper curvy. It'll be interesting to see how the markets react in the morning. 

Posted
1 hour ago, egg said:

Kyle was 1/100 this morning to be Chancellor. Odds like that suggested it was done and leaked. Not sure what's happened, of anything. I said I was expecting a few curveballs, but Healey is Chancellor is proper curvy. It'll be interesting to see how the markets react in the morning. 

Spent 5 years in Gordon Brown’s Treasury though and markets seem to like him. Mahmood is the most popular member of the cabinet with the wider public (albeit not her own left wing) so staying Home Sec makes sense.

If we’re talking curvy, Ed Miliband as Foreign Sec - even if he wanted it, that’s Marilyn Monroe.

’Over here Orange Rottweiler, enjoy your new chew toy’.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Spent 5 years in Gordon Brown’s Treasury though and markets seem to like him. Mahmood is the most popular member of the cabinet with the wider public (albeit not her own left wing) so staying Home Sec makes sense.

If we’re talking curvy, Ed Miliband as Foreign Sec - even if he wanted it, that’s Marilyn Monroe.

’Over here Orange Rottweiler, enjoy your new chew toy’.

We'll see tomorrow, but I think Heeley will be a wee bit more left than the markets will like. 

Milliband is odd as well. I thought he may get home sec.

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, egg said:

Milliband is odd as well. I thought he may get home sec.

I thought he’d be Health although Cooper is a solid pair of hands there. McFadden staying at DWP makes sense as needs someone who knows the brief to make reductions. 

Yes, we’ll see on Healey but I didn’t have him down as especially left. More of a presence to calm markets because Burnham does make bond markets more uneasy. Speccy enthusiastic https://spectator.com/article/john-healey-is-a-clever-choice-for-chancellor/

Edited by Gloucester Saint
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Gloucester Saint said:

Streeting just going in - what’s unfilled in the bigger cabinet positions? Defence? Energy?

D-Fence for Wes.

Posted
21 hours ago, iansums said:

What does amaze me is how many people WFH in recent weeks when we've had this heat wave. We are lucky enough to have really good AC in the office and some people choose to WFH in an oven, they can't be working efficiently.

No one ever WFH effectively or efficiently. Ever. Millions of people being layabouts. Everyone needs to be in the office.

  • Haha 1
Posted
7 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

D-Fence for Wes.

And Wesley Streeting’ goes into the end zone in overtime, touchdown!

Dannett wasn’t enthusiastic the other day but then he wouldn’t be unless it was John Healey or Ben Wallace had defected parties. 

Posted
4 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

No one ever WFH effectively or efficiently. Ever. Millions of people being layabouts. Everyone needs to be in the office.

Rubbish.

A lot of IT jobs can be done from home. It's not difficult to monitor what someone is doing and it can be advantageous for parents who may have to pop out to pick up the kids and make the time up later (or earlier).

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

No one ever WFH effectively or efficiently. Ever. Millions of people being layabouts. Everyone needs to be in the office.

Absolute horseshit.

Posted
38 minutes ago, ecuk268 said:

Rubbish.

A lot of IT jobs can be done from home. It's not difficult to monitor what someone is doing and it can be advantageous for parents who may have to pop out to pick up the kids and make the time up later (or earlier).

I was being sarcastic in regards to another post!

Posted
51 minutes ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

I was being sarcastic in regards to another post!

And I was talking specifically about WFH in the recent heatwave. It is certainly convenient to WFH if you have a medical appointment or have workmen at home etc. Personally, I much prefer to be in the office.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

I was being sarcastic in regards to another post!

If it helps, I realised that

Posted
38 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Apparently Burnhams missus once appeared on Blind Date, massive kudos points for that 

Her ‘date’ was a guy who later worked for the Tory party, they met again several years later in the HoC.

Posted
1 hour ago, Turkish said:

Apparently Burnhams missus once appeared on Blind Date, massive kudos points for that 

She was apparently the top totty in her year at Cambridge Uni, and people were amazed that he bagged her.

Posted
6 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

She was apparently the top totty in her year at Cambridge Uni, and people were amazed that he bagged her.

Competition doesn't look like it was too stiff....

spacer.png

 

Looks like an episode of Rainbow!

  • Haha 3
Posted

So yesterday's 'teaser' that the cost of living would be looked at with fully costed funding that will be announced today, is basically £1 per week saved in VAT on fuel bills.  Oh, and there is no explanation as to how this will be funded!  I think there was a reference to using the scrapped ID card folly, but there was never any funding in place for that.

I don't want to sound ungrateful, but the proposal will basically pay for two Euromillions tickets every five weeks.  Fingers crossed for a bigger windfall with those!

Posted
4 hours ago, iansums said:

And I was talking specifically about WFH in the recent heatwave. It is certainly convenient to WFH if you have a medical appointment or have workmen at home etc. Personally, I much prefer to be in the office.

Convenient, yes. I'm one of those who's convinced that it suits many employees much more than it suits most employers. 

Posted (edited)

Obviously very early days but binning all the bizarre self harm policies is a good start - scrapping digital ID and the jury trials removal, noises about drilling starting up again, tax breaks for hospitality. If they bin Chagos, assisted suicide, green levies and do something about migrants then they could well be reelected.

Edited by hypochondriac
Posted
11 hours ago, JohnnyShearer2.0 said:

No one ever WFH effectively or efficiently. Ever. Millions of people being layabouts. Everyone needs to be in the office.

I approve this message 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...