Jump to content

The Burnham Years - Can the new(ish) broom sweep clean?


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

Has this thread been officially sanctioned by @sadoldgit?

 

He certainly wouldn't be happy I started it, if you're not allowed a vote then you shouldn't be allowed to start forum threads either! I think he's retired from The Lounge anyway.

Posted
Just now, iansums said:

He certainly wouldn't be happy I started it, if you're not allowed a vote then you shouldn't be allowed to start forum threads either! I think he's retired from The Lounge anyway.

If you had the backing of the thread creation union, then that's all that really counts if it's a Labour thread. As we're about to find out, union demands are much more important than what voters want. 🙂

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Holmes_and_Watson said:

If you had the backing of the thread creation union, then that's all that really counts if it's a Labour thread. As we're about to find out, union demands are much more important than what voters want. 🙂

 

Union members are voters too. ( Assume that Iansums is not a union member ).

Edited by badgerx16
Posted
9 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Union members are voters too. ( Assume that Iansums is not a union member ).

Certainly not, and never have been, although not sure I've ever had the option working in my industry and relatively small companies.

Posted
15 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Union members are voters too. ( Assume that Iansums is not a union member ).

Oh, like I'm going to let that get in the way of claiming the first grumpy stereotype of the thread prize. 🙂

Posted

Hopefully we can get back to grey, boring politics again after the crazy, psycho dramas of the last few years.

Burnham's Labour will certainly hit the ground running but it doesn’t look like they will be given much of a honeymoon period.

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 hour ago, iansums said:

Well somebody had to do it! Hope he makes a better job of it than Starmer.

Delete the thread. The person who started it isnt allowed an opinion on politics. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, whelk said:

He likes The Smiths and The Stone Roses. A good sign

Champagne Manc. He's probably got some fake story about when he went to the Hacienda as well. It'll be his "my dad was a tool maker" mantra. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Turkish said:

Champagne Manc. He's probably got some fake story about when he went to the Hacienda as well. It'll be his "my dad was a tool maker" mantra. 

He did used to go to the  Hacienda on Thursday night 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, iansums said:

Certainly not, and never have been, although not sure I've ever had the option working in my industry and relatively small companies.

In most businesses I think people would not want to be a member of a union because of the negative connotations, hence why they don’t thrive in those environments. I don’t hold out much hope for improvement but at least he doesn’t look like he is going to appoint Red Ed as chancellor 

Edited by Sir Ralph
Posted
27 minutes ago, Sir Ralph said:

In most businesses I think people would not want to be a member of a union because of the negative connotations, hence why they don’t thrive in those environments. I don’t hold out much hope for improvement but at least he doesn’t look like he is going to appoint Red Ed as chancellor 

What are those negative connotations?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...