AlexLaw76 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Given how the world works, I assume we will be reinstated to a FA Cup final. 4
The Kraken Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 12 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: Given how the world works, I assume we will be reinstated to a FA Cup final. Given how none of the charges relate to last season, I assume we won’t.
Sarnia Cherie Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 16 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said: Given how the world works, I assume we will be reinstated to a FA Cup final. BBC News said clubs will be looking into some form of recompense now and why not us?
do i not like fizzy pop Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Steady on all, 114 guilty counts of serious financial breaches pale in to insignificance compared to sending a lad with an iPhone to watch a training session. 2
Baird of the land Posted 54 minutes ago Posted 54 minutes ago After the Chelsea incident Waiting for the joke punishment.
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago Guilty of 114 charges?! What did Parsons confess to?! Oh, City...
UpweySaint Posted 51 minutes ago Posted 51 minutes ago 24 minutes ago, The Kraken said: Given how none of the charges relate to last season, I assume we won’t. Technically true and it’s never going to happen but surely if you cheat financial rules in previous seasons you still benefit from it for a number of reasons for years to come? If City don’t win their appeal I’m curious to see just how hard they get hit.
AlexLaw76 Posted 49 minutes ago Posted 49 minutes ago 20 minutes ago, The Kraken said: Given how none of the charges relate to last season, I assume we won’t. I am being flippant, (which I am sure you knew), but is there a right-hand marker for any remuneration/remedies to their shortcomings? Their charges go up to 2023 (in some cases), does that mean they can never ever get the suggested "Asterix" next to their 2024 premier league title? Quote In relation to Manchester City, the Premier League's current rules expressly preserve its ability to initiate or continue enforcement action concerning PSR breaches for seasons ending 2025/26 and earlier, even though PSRs have been replaced by the new SCR system from 2026/27. I am guessing not judging by your comment.
tdmickey3 Posted 47 minutes ago Posted 47 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, UpweySaint said: Technically true and it’s never going to happen but surely if you cheat financial rules in previous seasons you still benefit from it for a number of reasons for years to come? If City don’t win their appeal I’m curious to see just how hard they get hit.
coalman Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago The only crime they're guilty of is caring too much about football.
beatlesaint Posted 44 minutes ago Posted 44 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, Baird of the land said: After the Chelsea incident Waiting for the joke punishment. £500 and they have to buy the cakes for every Prem League meeting for a whole year
Turkish Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago 2 minutes ago, coalman said: The only crime they're guilty of is caring too much about football. Agreed. These charges should be ignored given the enjoyment we’ve all got from seeing them bring such amazing players to the premier league, the worlds greatest manager and entertaining us all with amazing football. Football is an entertainment industry and no one can argue they haven’t done that. So they broke a few rules? Small price to pay for what they’re done for the premier league brand globally and that’s all that matters
The Kraken Posted 33 minutes ago Posted 33 minutes ago (edited) What should happen is that they get a Rangers style punishment and sent down to League 2. Some of the charges are awful, it’s way beyond overspending, it’s a huge deception, corruption and then cover up of finances from Man City. What will actually likely happen will be a massive dilution and Everton’s punishment will stay as being more severe. Much like Chelsea just got a slap on the wrist, but on a much bigger scale. Edited 33 minutes ago by The Kraken 3
die Mannyschaft Posted 19 minutes ago Posted 19 minutes ago Is getting -10 points for going into administration similar to these financial 115 breaches ? Or are City in a totally different financial situation? So its just the Everton and Derby cases that are comparable?
sfc4prem Posted 19 minutes ago Posted 19 minutes ago 13 minutes ago, trousers said: Has spoken a lot of sense in the last year, this man. 2
Turkish Posted 7 minutes ago Posted 7 minutes ago 23 minutes ago, The Kraken said: What should happen is that they get a Rangers style punishment and sent down to League 2. Some of the charges are awful, it’s way beyond overspending, it’s a huge deception, corruption and then cover up of finances from Man City. What will actually likely happen will be a massive dilution and Everton’s punishment will stay as being more severe. Much like Chelsea just got a slap on the wrist, but on a much bigger scale. Sadly you’re probably right. I know it’s a completely different offence but it will really show how serious they are about apply the rules consistently to the big and the lesser clubs. I fully expect them to get a relatively light punishment, probably a large fine which will be a drop in the ocean to their owners and a points deduction which might mean it’s tough for them to qualify for the champions league this season.
Lighthouse Posted 2 minutes ago Posted 2 minutes ago I would be curious to see how many Haaland scored in the National League North, if he stayed. 1
coalman Posted 1 minute ago Posted 1 minute ago What needs to happen is the FA dish out a punishment so severe to Eckert and Southampton such that nobody notices them letting Man City off with a slapped wrist.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now