Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

£50k with £25k suspended. That’ll hurt.

I’m sure one of their owners will rummage through some old trouser pockets for enough to cover that.

Wonder if their manager was aware…

Edited by TheAlehouseBrawlers
Posted

So basically it was just sloppy work from one of their admin assistants in filing some paperwork for players they had signed legitimately. Nothing to really see here.

  • Confused 1
Posted

Other teams have had points deduction, but generally the rule is if they win they get points deduction, and if they don't then its a fine.

Seems a bit stupid logic to me, but there ya go.

Posted
17 minutes ago, Lighthouse said:

So basically it was just sloppy work from one of their admin assistants in filing some paperwork for players they had signed legitimately. Nothing to really see here.

Ignorance of the rules is no excuse. 

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, BARCELONASAINT said:

wasn't it Rotherham that got a points deduction for doing the exact same thing?? Double standards by the EFL?!

If you mean this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/32433528

Then no, it wasn't the exact same thing. His loan had expired and he shouldn't have been played.

5 minutes ago, Sheaf Saint said:

Ignorance of the rules is no excuse. 

Absolutely, that's why they got a fine, so it's all sorted.

Posted

This is going to end up with a spiderman meme situation of both sets of fans calling the other side cheats next time we play...:mcinnes:

Didn't mind their video mocking us at the time, but they would have known about their own rule-breaking by that point in time, when they would have done better to keep schtum. Would be nice for their fans to be a bit more circumspect about us next time we face them, rather than acting like we denied them a shot at the premier league.

As a default position, I'd tend towards sympathy over what is almost always an admin error, but the precedent is there for points deductions even in the event of defeat, going all the way back into the 19th Century (although I assume that maybe there have been countless other incidents that were quietly resolved by financial penalties). https://www.footballsite.co.uk/DYK/DYK29-PointsDeductions.htm

I'd be interested to understand the nuance in the EFL's decision making better, or maybe should just assume they flip a coin and head to the pub. Maybe Tonda can explain it to us when we face them next.

For genuine brazenness, the Tevez affair for West Ham seems like the precursor to the likes of Manchester City doing whatever they want, and seems to be worse than I remember: https://stefanborson.substack.com/p/revealed-what-really-happened-with-6b0

Guessing Wrexham were trying the "we can't get penalised if we didn't have any points in the first place" defence this season, in which case I'm happy to let them have their fun with their impending relegation battle. After all, they'll need something for their TV show that's a bit more interesting than a recruitment hunt for a secretary. Wonder if Phil Parsons offered them any words of sympathy or advice as part of his ongoing crusade on achieving compliance with the EFL rulebook? Maybe he should apply.

  • Like 1
Posted

I was Secretary of a local football club a few years back and made a mistake about signing a player six days prior to semi final, which the team won, instead of the 7 day rule.
We were thrown out of the competition and had no redress which was fair enough.
Shame we werent under the control of the EFL and it may only have been a fine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...