CB Fry

Clear case of you utterly failing to grasp the basics of this story. You've done a cracking job of demonstrating your feeble understanding a few times on this thread. We get it. You don't get it. Give up now.

I agree with that. I think I wrote that before I saw the snivelling stroppy teenager stuff their MD came out with.

I've posted four words in reply to you on two threads. Someone might want to take forums a wee bit less seriously. Oh no. 30 odd words. Call me a stalker.

Have they increased the allocation yet?

That's nice, dear.

No.

Not really. That last report was based on worked up from some pretty non committal actual quotes.

UKIP could very well see themselves getting SDP'ed, where they achieve a huge raft of votes for bugger all seats, say five or six. Might kick up a bit of collective outrage akin to the "the 45%" stuff in Scotland. Just think, Farage's ultimate legacy could end up being, finally, a proportional voting system, just about the most Lib Demmy thing you could imagine.

UKIP aren't really the ones complaining. And the tweet wasn't about UKIP.

For something that you say is so pointless you do go to some length, every week, to deconstruct whatever he says. And then get worked up about it. The rest of humanity worked out some time ago that these predictions are a bit of conversational froth and really not that important. About time you cottoned on too.

Lazy journo scum no match for our ginger destroyer.

Are there rumours of Lambert coming back? Must have missed that.

He's going to regret signing Fish. Fingers burnt, I fear.

Looks like quite a catch to me.

Err - you know it's you getting upset about this ad, right? My knickers are in no twist, I'd love to see you quote anything from this thread that shows different. As Verbal has just pointed out above, you seem to do an awful of "projecting" of your own thoughts into others and then getting upset. If I'd seen it first in the cinema I would have groaned as well. It's mawkish beyond belief and a poor use of ad spend in my opinion - I've already said that on this thread. Pay attention.

I'm not outraged by anything here, mock or otherwise. You're about to post up the letters you've written to Sainsbury's, AMV BBDO and The Royal British Legion, I take it. Looking forward to reading them.

Indeed. Any idiot can do it.

It's not a skill. Too easy for that. A bit like mocking gullible saps fawning over internet conspiracies.

Here's some "cheap shots", ignoring the "point" of an advertisement from Sainsbury's. Laughable. How you managed to compare it to cigarette ads took mind-bending skills of disingenuousness, but well done all the same. Laughable. Clue: that 2 minute advert was not trying to "compress the nightmare that lasted 4 years into something decent that lasted a few hours". Just a cheap shot of spectacular misunderstanding from you. Your shots are Aldi-cheap. Keep taking them.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/fa_cup/4071255.stm More than a few years ago. Ten years ago.

Didn't that get stopped a few years ago?

Which ones are you suggesting are nonplussed about implied anti-semitic remarks?

The Guardian broke the story.

Fair article overall, if a little obvious. The phrase "paper-thin squad" is harsh in Saints-world, but not so harsh if we are talking about being a top four club. At the highest level we are thin. We need luck with injuries because we're not going to ever truly have a full top-4 squad. We've got a strong first 14/5 though. I think the other clubs getting it together is the biggest threat, and Man U and Liverpool I think will get it together eventually. Spurs not so much. We're in the mix like never before (in the CL era) but there's a long old way to go.

Common sense prevails. Well done SUFC.