CB Fry

They are not suspects now. They won't be in a years time, or in five years time. You and your little scumbag community can carry on spreading lies, misquotations and general hate about them, but none of it will change that fact. And please do point me in the direction of a quote from me about my opinion of how and why they left their children that night for you to come to you little conclusion I have "no problem with it". But that's how you work, isn't it? A lie, an assumption, a judgement. Based on f uck all. Yeah, carry on. Call me objectionable. I see what you do and need no approval from your sort.

He'll know what to say then.

Hilarious, I'm sure.

And it does do that, as its support of the FL (vs the woeful ITV era) and its noble if possibly misguided trumpeting of the Women's game also does. There is a Daily Mail-esque train of thought of that's all the BBC should do, showing the sh it no one else wants to. Well, its boll ocks. One of the three Reithian principles was "to entertain". The BBC cover the Premier League perfectlying well, the coverage of the bigger clubs reflect the interest level in those clubs. The fact is, no one apart from West Brom fans really care about watching huge swathes of coverage about West Brom. Let's keep an eye on this forum. Specifically the non Saints football threads. Let's see, over the next month, how many get started about the CL teams/top 6. And how many get started Alan Irvine's team selection, or San Dyche's post match comments. I expect, this forum's very own Angelman, with his aching need to see coverage of a wider spread of clubs, will take the lead on this.

Never stops being hilarious, does it? You really am so funny.

The BBC are a public service broadcaster. Covering the clubs people are interested in - the bigger clubs - fills that remit. Let's not pretend the the wider public are interested in seeing "a much wider focus on clubs". I'd suggest you're not either. It's just a euphemism for "Put my club on more, put my club on more". Or are you desperate to watch Peterborough vs Barnsley for twenty minutes at 10:30pm on Saturday Night, with big old horrible Premier League clubs like, say, Southampton pushed back to three minutes at midnight? I mean, it's only fair innit?

The next time we're on MOTD first in a couple of months time will be the first time I can ever remember us being on MOTD first I can tell you.

Jonathan Pearce ruined it by saying our 6-3 Man U win was the Grey Shirt match. Wally. Apart from that, just lovely to watch. Effing brilliant.

Are you twelve years old?

It's very satisfying, when in a pessimistic moment where I worry what would happen to our team if one of our key players got injured, to remember that one of our key players IS currently injured and we're doing effing great anyway. But the point is, Jay Rod will come back just in time to cover African Cup of Nations and/or inevitable injury or loss of form to someone else. Basically what I am saying is we're nailed on fourth place.

We were always going to be. We won 8 flipping nil.

I do hope SaintRichmond got his refund on his season ticket. He was conned, I tell you. Conned.

It's just like watching Dagenham and Redbridge.

That's one curse broken already. Looking like we should see them both off by 5pm.

In fairness I am being paid by the Government to post on here, specifically to destabilise Pap. Well, I say Government, its just agency work. I guess it's the Government originally. Anyway, it is a nice little sideline for me. Should pay for a family holiday in Croatia next year. And it's looking like it's opened a few doors. Adecco have come back to me with a couple of new job offers. One is hounding out a Jew-conspiracy pro-gun lobby nut from a popular Carp Fishing forum. Decent money, although I need to learn a bit about competition angling first.

Why don't we get those detailed reports of what happened at that Austrian printing company anymore? After all, that was conclusive proof that Katharina was a bumbling clueless idiot who didn't know the first thing about business.

You're not "missing anything". Dont worry, the CPS have no role. The UK and Portuguese forces have been working together and after a lot of time and money the McCanns aren't suspects, much to the fury of the dribblers. And they won't ever be. So the CPS or the Portuguese equivalent won't ever be troubling old K&G anytime soon. In terms of people you can "sort of wonder what their role is", how about "respected former policeman" John Stalker, one of the poster boys of the dribblers' campaign. He's got absolutely nothing to do with anything but SOG on this very thread mentions him as a supporter of his side of the argument. (Anyone who reads what Stalker actually said would know he isn't but hey "I must be missing something", too). So there is plenty of total irrelevance out there, but 99% of it on the dribblers' side.

Fair play, Hypo, that looks like it's a beautiful thing, especially if it has Spectrum games. Does it have Amstrad CPC games? Asking for a friend.

Loads of us spotted it, it was pretty obvious that Adkins knew he wasn't long for the job, and that getting promoted probably wouldn't save him. That bizarre post-match interview combined with the various rumours flying round made the whole thing look like only a matter of time, which it was. Of course MLG and other forum bright sparks happy to dismiss all of it as completely fabricated by lazy lying scumbag journalists. And how right they were.

Are they suspects now? I mean, I'm just ignorant and you work for the CPS and everything, so you must know this stuff. Are they suspects now?

Obviously I am not the only person who think the McCanns have no case to answer. The police (in either country) don't, neither do the CPS. They are not suspects and never will be. The McCann file-ers and the community of airheads perpetuating myths, half truths and fabrication to try and create "things that don't add up" when, in reality, there is nothing apart from lies, noise and hate dressed up as "we want justice for a little girl". Seriously, fu ck off.

I'm not arguing anything. I'm simply talking down to you.

It could have been so different.

There isn't "plenty of evidence", sweetheart. A website created by Internet nutcases primarily is not evidence. Although, to you, no doubt it's a "great resource". Four hours of rambling video created by your hero Richard E Grant is not evidence either. As Gemmel said, if there was enough evidence there would be a trial. There isn't, because they didn't do it.

Let's remember who called who "ignorant" shall we. And let's remember which one of us is fawning over the half-formed, conjecture riddled, sensationalist falsehoods churned out by a fruitcake who thinks 9/11 was faked. Let's remember which one of us has swallowed the "Police dogs are never wrong" horseshi it. Let's remember which one of us watched four freaking hours of it. But yeah, I'm the ignorant one.