Patrick Bateman
Subscribed Users-
Posts
4913 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Patrick Bateman
-
I wouldn't go anywhere near it! http://www.avert.org/hiv-aids-transmission.htm
-
And extremely overweight.
-
Updated : Tadanari Lee Set to Sign
Patrick Bateman replied to Matthew Le Tissier's topic in The Saints
You f*cking stupid, thick, lame, whinging bunch of c*nts. No wonder no one uses this forum, no wonder it's appeal has ended for many people if sarcastic fat c*nts like Alpine exist, posting on here. -
Updated : Tadanari Lee Set to Sign
Patrick Bateman replied to Matthew Le Tissier's topic in The Saints
Not sure if anyone else has mentioned it (I can't be bothered to read through 30 pages of drivel, it's ridiculous), but have any of you whingers and doubters not realised it's Chinese AND Korean New Year today and they have all week to celebrate. He's Korean, right? Think about it. -
Oh come on, don't be such a bloody square!
-
He's a f**king stupid pr*ck. He'll wake up with a horse head in his bed ... What a bellend.
-
Why does everyone attack him? He was a fantastic player for us.
-
Couldn't give a toss, pick up a book or use a real encyclopedia!
-
P*ss off you complete helmet. To sensible Celtic fans; I've read that Celtic are struggling financially, but haven't seen any news evidence to back that up, what is the true state of affairs? I know there isn't the sponsorship or TV money that the Premiership has, is that the reason for the (possible) assumption?
-
Forest 0 - 3 Saints Post Match Reaction
Patrick Bateman replied to Saint_clark's topic in The Saints
"It's 26 years since Forest last failed to score in a home league game with Southampton." Nice. -
In fact generally I want to punch Adam Sandler in the face, a lot. The Wedding Singer being the only passable film he's made.
-
I nominate Billy Madison, utter, utter gash: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0112508/ My wife nominates Pin: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095871/
-
This is inspired!
-
Bingo! I know many people (having grown up down there) that would use that rail link rather than suffer the bloody A326 every day! Better for the environment too.
-
But that's just it, it isn't modernising the train system already in place, it's building something brand new and utterly pointless. I commute every day in to London Waterloo, so far, every day this YEAR, my train has been late, by 10 minutes to 30 minutes. For which I pay almost £5k a year for honour. I would far rather the money was spent on improving what we already have and bringing down the prices of a train journey. There are so many improvements they could make with the money; longer trains, improved platform space, better signalling allowing trains to run closer together, better signalling that doesn't fail, upgrading London mainline stations to take more trains at once and so on. This HS2 project is a large bag of balls. Utterly pointless. I would like someone to present me with a compelling business case for a £30m spend. Let's face it, it won't be £30m either, it'll be £100m by the time some private sector company has employed a bunch of useless and gutless Project Managers who are green and bugger up the schedule, the resourcing, the logistics etc etc etc. As for people using HS2, people do know the prices of a train journey will be obscene, right? In fact I am totally appalled by this idea and for the first time, I am thinking of writing to my MP (whom I voted for).
-
Indeed mate. If we do get promoted, obviously Nigel and the lads would have done a great job, but if we spend a lot this transfer window, we can also thank the Academy for bringing us the funds to do, via Chamberlain.
-
In that case; great size house, large garden, ready to rent to Olympians for London 2012. Fleet station to Waterloo is 44 minutes, trains every 20 minutes. Yours for £15k for the London 2012 Olympic duration. Now where do I put that advert??
-
40 miles?? I doubt it! Fleet is within 40 miles and I certainly wouldn't have thought anyone would want to rent here, for the Olympics.
-
Wasn't going to bother posting on here, but sod it, I will. I've known "Turkish" for years, probably since '98 or so actually - he's a sound guy. No, he isn't "Stu" or anyone else either. Think like a few of us, he's fed up of the way this forum has gone from being a decent football forum (Saintsforever on Network54) to something that is populated by a fair few internet weirdos where anything funny is outlawed and where people are obsessed with talking absolute tripe. There are some good people who post on here, but unfortunately, the majority are a bit odd. I can't be bothered posting much on here anymore as a) I need to pay and I don't see why I should have to and b) it's a bit slow, news is more readily available on Twitter and the official Saints site and c) like many of the original Saintsforever Network 54 lot, I've got older, got more work responsibility and simply don't have the bloody time. So, unless you know "Turkish" in person, your views are misguided and you really do take the internets far too seriously. p.s. Supermikey ... I think I talked to you in the Wetherspoons in Fleet. You were f**king hammered.
-
What else did you expect from this weird forum?
-
It really is time to bring back the death penalty
Patrick Bateman replied to alpine_saint's topic in The Lounge
But enough about your visits to Mistress Ball-crusher, what do you really think? -
It really is time to bring back the death penalty
Patrick Bateman replied to alpine_saint's topic in The Lounge
Being honest, I would have sentenced to death people like Myra Hindley, Ian Brady, Fred West, the caretaker guy etc., i.e. where there is absolute certainty and there really is no hope that you could rid them of the evil thought process. You simply can't! But in this instance, she's disgusting and stupid, but you couldn't kill her for it. She should be beaten. Well okay, sent to prison for a long time. -
I would totally agree with this! I don't think our MPs get a massive salary for the job they do, the responsibility they have and the grief they take. Would you do it for £80k? I wouldn't.
-
And yes of course I am generalising with who uses Facebook, but that's how it appears when I scan through.
-
Rubbish, totally disagree. If anything, online usage will just increase as "social media" becomes more clever and useful in everyday circumstances. I agree that Facebook in it's current format is limited and in fact, seems to only be used by those who don't work - women at home with babies, kids, jobless. Most of my news feed is void during the day and I can't be bothered to post anything on there and nor do many I know. Twitter on the other hand is very powerful, much more so as the short, sharp messages mean you can quickly trawl a news feed and pick out bits immediately interesting to you. It is also by far the quickest way to find out what's happening (either on your train, in the world, in your town etc.) - Twitter has far more potential than something like Facebook. I don't want to see pictures of your baby that looks just like all the other babies, I don't want to see your holiday pictures, I just want a short sharp sentence; what is the Saints score? How did Tim Howard score against Bolton? Why is my train delayed when the guard is silent? etc.
