aintforever

I'm not suggesting people from Porton Down did it, just that it's a bit odd that Europes first chemical weapons attack since WW2 happened on the doorstep of the UK's chemical defence experimental establishment. On the face of it the most likely perpetrator is obviously the Russian government but just because it's the same agent as developed by Russia 20 years ago is not proof in itself the the state was behind it. Corbyn is 100% right in saying that we shouldn't rush ahead of the evidence.

It would be interesting to see what evidence there actually is. All we have been told is that it is Novichok which is the same type as developed by Russia. How easily can it be created? Could it easily be copied? It is all a bit suspicious, an obvious Kremlin target, attacked with an obvious Russian chemical weapon - a stones through from the UK centre of chemical weapons. Corbyn is absolutely correct in that any actions should be based on facts.

Decent record that, especially considering QPR are a bit of a basket case.

It’s almost as if we’re in a position where we can’t pick and choose the finest manager around.

I knew compo was paid, just assumed that was worked out after the manager resigned, didn’t realised we could have just told Spurs no. I guess Saints will just cash in on anything.

They couldn’t have wanted him very badly if they were not prepared to pay a bit of compo.

How come our managers leave at will then? There would be nothing stopping Everton adding the money to his salary there anyway.

Surely if he wanted to go to Everton he could have just resigned?

I’d be happy if the team pulled out, we’re **** anyway.

If Hughes keeps us up he will have done a very good job so I expect he will be kept on. Don't really see the logic is sacking someone who's doing a very good job.

If we hired Silva you would get the same ****-heads on here moaning that we hired someone who took Hull down.

Potter - do You really think that is less risky and realistic considering we need someone now and he already has a job? If he did fancy throwing his career away for an 8 game relegation battle, is getting a manager with zero Premier League experience a good idea considering we need results straight away? He has done great in Sweden but throwing him into this season’s cluster-**** hoping he will instantly make an impact would be way way more risky than Hughes.

Who?

Deluded idiots like you deserve relegation.

What a pussy.

We’re aiming to stay up, that’s all that matters at this point in time.

Who would you have then?

Exactly. This place is full of delusional idiots.

We all knew we would be looking at bargain basement options given our position, I don’t get why some are so against Hughes - who exactly were they expecting? We will probably go down regardless of who we hire even if we improve, we can only attract managers who won’t mind having Relegation on their CV, that’s the situation we are in.

Whoever we get will divide opinion. Who gives a ****e what some reporter thinks, I rate journos opinions about as highly as ****ed bloke down pub. Having the ability to write stories doesn’t mean you have any special knowledge of football.

Have you been in a coma or something? Take a look at the league table, we’re not aiming for Europe.

Long term I would tend to agree but can't see him walking into the current sh!t storm and stop us getting relegated.

And they flogged their top scorer, which in their position was suicidal.

Hughes’ record at Stoke wasn’t too bad, as a short term fix he could be what we need. Not sure why some on here seem to think we are in a position to pick and choose our ideal manager, there is going to be a limit to who we can attract.

I’d be happy with Hughes. It’s a fire-fighting job until the end of the season, you need someone with experience and stature who knows the Prem IMO.