Fan The Flames

That's because your wife buys your clothes 😁

That would be good when we are cruising to a win, our very own Poznan.

A good coach can do both. They will have their preferred style, but also can play a way that suits the current crop, whilst transistioning to the prefered style.

A follow up on Micky Fialka's post consortium career would be interesting.

The Medway towns, origin of the word Chav, but not really as bad as you make out, just an ordinary place with some nice areas and some shit ones.

Yeah the season we were unfairly docked 10 points, we went on a really good run at the end but the -10 meant we couldn't make the playoffs by the time we played Gillingham and lost 2-1. Rochester High Street is where the decent pubs are.

As long as a future headline isn't 'Martin Loser King'.

Do the Russell

Over the moon, my nearest club, will have some of that.

They are also saying that interest rate are higher in America and that food inflation is higher in Sweden, so that's alright then.

This is the problem with conspiracy theorists, they can't help but believe them all. And as you say stuff just gets lost in the noise. What is that letter suppose to prove, the WEF is a thing and the Great Reset is their latest project, its on their website ffs, its not some big secret https://www.weforum.org/focus/the-great-reset

You have to assume the Johnson has some shit on Sunak.

We didn't have a striped shirt for nearly the whole of the 80's, from me being 10 to 19, so it's upholding tradition for this 52 year old.

I wasn't a lover of it the first time around, but grew to like it over the years. Like this new one, I prefer the sleave detail on this one. My 13 year old said it's decent, that's high praise.

I don't remember hating Souness when he fell out with Lowe, as a pundit I thought he was all right, a bit of a caricature at times, so is there something that I missed. Hats off to him for this achievement.

Exactly. If you've been in charge for 13 years and fucked A up, you can see why the tories are desperate to focus the argument on to dress wearing posties with cocks.

It's no surprise this has leaked, the Tories see this as a trap to snare the left. Project Fear, look at the world you're going to get under Labour stuff. It's all they have as they have failed on the economy and public services.

LD you still don't get it, it not all about the parties, the rules or whatever you want to shuffle the argument on to. It's about contempt or parliment, we can not have MPs lying to parliment. They lie to the media, to constituents all the time, so there has to be a place where they have to tell the truth. Just like business needs the rule of law to thrive, democracy needs truth. Otherwise parties of all colours will be making cunts out of us all. Argue all you want about the fluff but there is no where to go with Johnson's lying to parliment.

What a bunch of dorks, why do people look up to these dullards.

Personally I think you should only have a recall for standards, not policy. There needs to be a trigger, not just because the constituents want one, otherwise its a neverendum.

It was naive, because they were played by the tories. Got the tories into power at the cost of their reputation, which damaged their chances in the next election. Win win for the Eton boys. The LD exist to be the junior member of a coalition and they have to go into power with the largest party, not just labour. Otherwise they just become Labour's joker card. The problem is they didn't exract enough policy, they just tempered the tories and that's what dented their reputation. The lessson for the LDs is they shouldn't appear desperate to get into power, they should hold their position and be prepared for another election and make the other party desperate for their seats.

Scroll a few posts up and you were banging on about the personalities, now it's not about them. Then the last bit of your post is back to being about the personalities. You're all over the place, it's like debating with a son-in-law.

Not if they came to the right result.

You are just mixing bollocks up, because you haven't got any where else to go. This isn't about MPs parliamentary performance or whether they haven't represented their constituents properly. This is about standards in parliament, which were serverly eroded by Johnson and his cronies, because that's what populist right wing parties do. This leave it to the constituents to decided, is 'the people v elites' nonsense, designed to give these wankers the space they need to do whatever they like. There are rules in every aspect of life and the government shouldn't be let off them. It beggers belief that people, from MPs to pub bores, ignore all the evidence and denigrate our democracy, just because Johnson is their man.

This is just a straw man argument and you know it, the answer is simple, Chris Byrant was vociferous in his views on Johnson, Harriet Harman wasn't. There were more tories on the committee and HH only had a casting vote. He lied and there is no way a greasing the pig on this one.