buctootim

You remembered her name. You sir, are a gentleman.

pregnancy

Blackberry

Interesting fact from psychology. The more people say 'believe me' the stronger the indication that they are lying. Leftback says it after every post. You can believe him about Cortese's Italian connections or the Guardian and the Times. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/football_league/article7070442.ece.

Peril

forum

Trojan

Odd then that Adkins has gone out of his way to praise the outstanding medical, physio and conditioning team. Maybe, just maybe, it was AP in the wrong. Who'd have thunk it?

I dont think you have anything to worry about. Yes it sounds like you broke copyright, but if you werent making money out of it all he is likely to be able to get is a 'cease and desist notice (ie stop doing what youre doing). Only if you continue the breach after that notice will he have a chance of damages - according to this photographers website anyway. http://www.photographywebsite.co.uk/copyright-in-photography-c494.html "One of the more common misconceptions about photograph copyright is that if you are not charging for a photograph then there is no copyright violation taking place. This is simply incorrect, all this will actually affect is the amount of damages that can be awarded in court, not the actual judgement of the crime itself. If your photographs are being reproduced on the internet without your permission but the person doing the reproducing is not charging for them then it will probably never end up in a court room as any legal advice you solicit will forward a cease and desist order noting the breaking of copyright to the person doing the reproducing. Court action will only be taken if they choose to ignore the cease and desist order."

Nah. She wouldnt go for it with me either

We might not be playing any better, but a least we havent given up in the second half like previous games

she makes it between her thighs

No, but even though its a small sample, getting a 96% to 4% result is compelling.

Major major difference between expressing views as an individual fan and answering them in their official capacity of an organisation purporting to represent the views of large numbers of Saints fans.

You think Saints have 2,493,000 fans? Interesting, either that or you are ****e at maths

Thats the MI6 building. They do overseas surveillance not domestic

The honeymoon period does exist. Saints get consistently ****ed for months when a new guy comes in.

Three Billie Goats

Hummer

Bingo Geneva! TAV was an agency, had lots of short term, mostly manual, contract work, all I could get in the early 80s recession. The one I worked for was by the Bargate though. Moved away to go to Sussex University at 24, afterwards got into the NHS contracting (planning heathcare), did a couple of funding jobs giving other peoples money away, worked at Monterey Bay aquarium, and now work for a ocean conservation charity based in Washington (though I work in UK). Still live in Sussex.

Smoked cheddar (crumbly, not rubber)

I dont mind NI. Hes reasonably lucid and whilst he doesnt represent me, his views are pretty mainstream. SISA are totally different, they have an ulterior agenda, one that I actively oppose.

He's only been used as a sub anyway.

County Court, loads of TAV jobs (Kiplings, Ocean Trading, Meatpack, FIAT importers, Britvic Corona), BBCtv South then moved away.

Born French Street (1yr), Crookham Road Weston (11 yrs), Glenfield Avenue Bitterne (2yrs), Hill Lane (6 yrs), various crappy digs around Portswood and Northam (3yrs), Bangkok, Brighton, Monterey CA, Brighton, Hassocks. Weston Infants, Bitterne CoE Juniors, KES.