Matthew Le God

They didn't last season and they won't this season.

Bedtime viewing for Glasgow_Saint... [video=youtube;j_-UZ4ADjmY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_-UZ4ADjmY

For the 2013/14 campaign "Under 21 players" will have been born on or after 1st January 1992. - Nathaniel Clyne was born on 5th April 1991 so he won't be an under 21 player next season. - Paulo Gazzaniga was born on 2nd January 1992 - so he will still be an under 21 player (just! ) This is Southampton's list after the January 2013 transfer window... Source = http://www.premierleague.com/content/dam/premierleague/site-content/News/publications/squad-lists/squad-lists-February-2013.pdf

"Worth the two hour wait" - Really? He could have waited until tomorrow and stroll into the shop and get it with no waiting. Even later this afternoon the queue will disappear.

Why do you think that? For a £12m signing in the Premier League to be on under £40k p/w would be surprising.

Read the thread title and opening post to yourself word for word, it makes no sense. Exactly!

Is that English? I recognise all the the words, but I can't make sense of it. [video=youtube;-zHBN45fbo8]

You said it means... "I will be leaving in the summer for inter or Juventus." Put it in a translator and it doesn't say anything like that. He is talking about a youth game between his side Internacional and Juventude.

Juventude Not Juventus and the International youth team...

Google translate says... He is talking about Brazilian teams... and the International youth team...

Before Saints signed him would you have said Dejan Lovren was a "realistic signing"?

If it were left to many Saints fans we wouldn't have been signing players with profiles like Gaston Ramirez and Dejan Lovren. Given the number of man hours in the Saints recruitment department it isn't exactly time consuming to make enquiries for a player. If you don't ask, you don't get.

Yes, and I have now failed the Turing test.

By putting them on a building in Western Europe?

You don't know unless you ask and asking isn't particularly time consuming.

A 60/40 split isn't huge.

Should we start a campaign for that kit then? After all you think that was the first Saints kit and you can't get more traditional than that. Those wanting stripes are merely doing so because in their lifetimes that is what they associate with the club.

So why in 2010 did we celebrate the 125 anniversary? Yes, the name is different in 1885, but it is the same club.

So the club you support wasn't formed in 1885?

Why stripes? Why not follow through this logic and demand the 1885 sash returns? Any deviation from a club's original kit is a break from "tradition".

This thread was started last summer, when Umbro were the kit suppliers.

I knew you were joking.

Looks like QPR are missing out on £20m... http://www.qpr.co.uk/news/article/280613-cisse-departs-884736.aspx

"Come on you Saints" We've had non yellow away kits on numerous occasions, including black ones as recently as the League One promotion season.

The Daily Echo also claim in that article that Federico Arias is Ecuadorian (he is from Argentina). So not the most reliable of Daily Echo articles.