The science is changing all the time, especially when it doesn't hold up to the evidence, like the time that somebody realised that they hadn't included the amount of cloud cover in the system models, or that the canopy of the tropical rainforest had increased because of the extra CO2 and they couldn't measure this with satellites. All calculations are constantly changing. I have never said that what I was offering was new, I am just replying to statements that you repeat.
Yes, CO2 is one of the greenhouse gases.
Yes, we pump a lot of it into the atmosphere.
Yes, temperatures are rising somewhat.
So what? Correlation does not necessarily imply causation.
Despite all that is said there are a lot of other factors which have not yet been included in the models because there is as yet no related science.