Micky

Go here Hamster, the guys a complete pro... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1193384/What-did-expect-Incredible-face-revealed-man-tattooed-girl-56-stars-asked-three.html

Memories: Man on Moon Warrenpoint & Lord Mountbatten Falkland Islands Lady Di 9/11 Some because of their obvious global impact and some because I was in some way 'associated'. For instance, on the day of the Warrenpoint / Mountbatten attacks I was in an operations room monitoring radio networks and heard it unfolding first hand - probably the bleakest day of my life.

I get your point, and I too find it somewhat abhorent, but if you think that's bad, check this: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1193384/What-did-expect-Incredible-face-revealed-man-tattooed-girl-56-stars-asked-three.html A fairly recent case of 'tattoo gone bad', but look at that guy - would you really allow him to 'art you up'. No wayyyyyyyy.

He's annoyed init...!!! lol

He is a mong - he should of had his hands cut off to stop him trolling.

So do I, and with an address that I have not resided in for over probably 30 years...! I rent cars every month during the course of my job and have to present my licence every time - never had a problem yet - touch wood.

None None None Photos of trainers.... really..???

The test team were due to conduct testing on the players, but 'for some reason' the players were not available: "The programme also discovered that between April 2007 and August 2010, 240 drugs tests had to be abandoned because testers turned up at training grounds but players were not there. The clubs involved included Manchester City, Liverpool, Fulham, Everton, Newcastle, Swansea and Crystal Palace." In Pompeys case it was probably more a case that they couldn't find the training ground because, eerrr, they don't actually have one...!!!

Probably not, get used to it, move on. The 'ignore' button is free to use as you see fit as far as I am aware.

I seem to remember that at our lowest ebb, when things were really getting tight to the wire, almost coming out in favour of a certain LLS's attempts at a takeover...!!! Yikes - just think what might have been...

Here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulfletcher/2011/09/the_adkins_diet_gets_saints_in.html#297164 HTH Edit: Ohhhh - too slow, apologies...!!!

Dead easy decission, Connobert for me please...!!!

Dead easy, just read any of mine - they're all bloody dross...!!!

One thing that I have always disagreed with Ho about is the fact that he states that we are the only fans bothered about PFC's cheating. See how easily PFC's name comes to Lee Bowyer when talking about Birminghams current plight. http://www.skysports.com/video/inline/0,,16428_7164942,00.html

It's not rocket science, it's this. ^

fvkin X Factor - don't you just hate everything about it, preying on gullable young wannabes with absolutely no talent for cheap laughs, manufacturing some stereotypical 'pop idol' to line the pockets of the 'judges'. If I hear the comment 'you made that song your own' one more time.... ffs.

Sadly, single figures...!

Interesting blog / theories: http://ktwop.wordpress.com/2011/04/06/saab-fights-liquidity-crisis-while-victor-muller-plays-a-game/

Sorry, tend not to post on this thread too much but appreciate CH's input to try to put some balance to the argument, however, this is confusing: "Sorry FC, disagree completely about what may have been exploited. Most Saints posters still believe we spunked £130m on players and that's how we ran up the debt. In fact (as I keep saying) we were around £58m in debt at the point we started selling some of our best players (Diarra, Johnson, Muntari, Defoe etc.) This reduced the wage bill considerably and SHOULD have had the double effect of also reducing the debt level (is there anyone, even on this board who would disagree with that?). However, the fact is that from debts of £58m we sold players for more than £70m DID NOT keep buying big name, high fee players on huge wages but somehow saw the debt level DOUBLE???? Money that could and should have seen us running on a pretty much break even basis went missing - there's no other explanation for the situation. How you can view that as irrelavent is beyond me" I believe the oft quoted and widley accepted figure of debt was £130 million, given the figures above are we saying now that the club sold £70million pounds worth of players and a further £72 million also just 'went missing' without any explanation? Are there any theories or explanations as to how this money disappeared?

Interesting question actually if you look at his stats you can see that he has basically had 1 decent season since he left us. However in the past 4 seasons he has managed just 12 league goals in 80 games - last season he failed to score at all. http://www.premierleague.com/page/PlayerProfile/0,,12306~5991,00.html I think I'd pass on this one - sentiment could get you into trouble.

Nice to see that they have a positive spin on Dans performances for us as well, as opposed to some other rags.

Terrible news, hope he makes a full and speedy recovery and is back playing soon - get well soon Dan.

This, by far and away, this. Currently I believe we have something in the squad that money just can't buy.

It's a pipeline ffs, there's always something in it. What would be the point of having a pipeline otherwise....!!!!