St_Tel49

And of course he will continue not to be recognised if he played for Arsenal or Spurs

But you still have to look at the match in its entirety. Yes the referee may make a wrong decision re a penalty but in the last set of highlights that I watched I saw a player miss an open goal from inside the 6 yard box - that is surely as influential a reason for losing as any decision of the refs. Its more convenient to claim that the ref influenced the result though. Is a ref responsible for a player being too slow in moving forward in an offside trap? or failing to mark up properly? I agree that the standard of reffing has been poorer than usual this year but players and managers make life harder and harder for them and then moan like hell when their pressure succeeds in causing a string a dodgy decisions.

Arsenal are rapidly becoming Saints 2nd eleven

We slid up the league when we did it

TBH - if you saw that video and didn't know who he was there would be plenty on here demanding we sign him. He was better than a lot of people thought and did a real good job for us. I wish him nothing but success in the US

It would be interesting to see the sum of all the votes for the first 19 games for each player in the MoM polls. That would give us some sort of objective figure - and yes I know that each MoM poll is based on opinion too but each poll tends to be clear cut in its result. However, that aside, for me it is Davis for sheer consistency of high quality performances.

As TV money increases so do player's prices and wages. There's no point in looking at the price of players 1 or 2 years ago as a benchmark for prices now.

This - we can't fault his commitment on the field even though he was ****ed off at being told he couldn't leave.

He does not appear to fit the profile of player that we should be recruiting. He looks like trouble and a potential disruptive influence. I can only guess that if we do sign him RK thinks he can manage him and there are conditions surrounding his behaviour.

What is a false position? They are in the position that the number of points they have relative to everyone else entitles them to be so, to answer your question - well earned. Whether they stay there is anyone's guess but they have a fair shout.

No - please don't Too late

Vincent 1952 black lightning - Richard Thompson

This is just nonsense. Why would we compromise our own progress in the league just to suit Arsenal who have been second best to us this season until we were reduced to 10 men?

A very poor final question. I strongly support safe standing but don't personnally wish to use it. Your question is forcing a wrong answer from me on one of the points

That's a matter of opinion. I don't think that he would have got there

Not sure why my quote was paired here since I was, in my roundabout way, standing up for Forster. I certainly agree that AB could have done better. Forster's error was a howler but I seem to recollect couple by AB also - Arsenal springs to mind. Every keeper has them. There is not a lot between the two and Borucs may even, at the moment, be marginally better but FF has been brought in for the long term.

It's a pattern that I have noticed over the years that the keeper who isn't playing is better than the one who is. Stands to reason I suppose - they haven't let in any goals in that time!

It is a plausible idea but I would be surprised if we could get anyone with his attributes on the cheap.

Apparently the last exciting thing that happened to the club was on the 26th January

Its easy - just one less pint a night and you'll save it in no time

H'mmm shouldn't a government website be a .gov.uk?

Levy has not got an original idea in his head. He thinks "Who is doing something well - I know lets steal their people". It has worked well for him so far

No - he is simply much better than you believe and his stats consistently bear that out.