Tamesaint

That we will never know will we as he could not even get the easy ones right could he - eh, dickwad???

Is this an example of your excellent debating skills ... mush?? We don't expect unnerving accuracy for every game... just one would be nice. Wouldn't you agree .... dickwad??

I dion'texpect him to get EVERY score correct. I would expect a pundit paid to predict scores to get ONE score correct if he was any good. Woudn't you?? Otherwise why bother to employ him??

If he is not expected to get the score correct, then why does he predict it? Why not just predict the result?? He certainly is not a fortune teller but he doesn't appear to be much of a pundit. No scores correct today & QPR in 7th place if his predictions were correct !!

I never said that I expected him to get EVERTY score right. I would have thought that any so called expert who gets paid to predict scores on the BBC each week woud have been able to get ONE score right. Wouldn't you?

But he got every score wrong... and most of the results were easy to predict. Do you agree??

Kone is a good player. He took his goal against us very well back in August and now he is back from the ACON.

Of course. Reading v Wigan. You got that one wrong didn't you.

Wow. You don't say. There were really some easy games to predict today. Top playing bottom and guess what - top won!! Arsenal at home to Villa - Guess what . Arsenal won. The guy must be a genius for predicting that one. West Brom (8th in the league) at home to Sunderland. (13 th) Who could have guessed that West Brom who have just won at Anfield would have won that!! I suppose it takes a real expert to predict that one. Fulham v Stoke - Stoke have only won 1 away game all season. They have one of the worst away records in the league. Fancy. They lost at Fulham. He may have got the scores correct but it was one of the easiest weekends of the season to predict - and it is pretty amazing that a so called "expert" didn't even get one correct score. So when you call him a clueless, out of touch tosser (your words not mine) I think you are correct.

Have you ever wanted to know how to cook hedgehog?? Channel 4 this afternoon is showing Come Dine with Me with 5 residents of Portsmouth. I guess that will be 5 different hedgehog recipes,

Its 4 points actually and could be 7 points by Sunday evening. According to him we would have a goal difference of minus 23 not minus 9.... hardly suggests an "expert" with his finger on the pulse.

So does this mean that man did walk on the moon? I am sure that Delldays or some one will be round in a minute to clarify.

You like to live dangerously don't you. Wait until Turkish and the other bully boys see that you have written 2 positive comments about the future. Don't you realise that is not allowed on a "mong" board. I bet one of the bright sparks mentions man walking on the moon.

Absolutely brilliant.

Because I can

Thatsallright then. I bet Porky Penny is looking forward to meeting loads of new folk in League 2 next season.

15,000 is a bit too many at this tage. Expand the Kingsland. Get another 8k seats in there and then lets see what happens.

LOL How many are there in this photo? By my reckoning about 14 in the back row and about 50 in total. If you are as simple and as "special" as Neil allen it doesn't take much to be "incredible"

Spot on.

You are probably correct. It would be strange if only 31,700 pople wanted to go to the match. I am sure that we would could have sold more.

I would totally agree. 39k would do us nice at the moment.

After tonight, with 31,700 at SMS now desperate to come back for more, I would suggest that expansion is now a must. Ground capacity is the only thing holding this club back.

I did - I was the first one on the prediction league to do so. ... but my performance in the Prediction League is not one to writehome about. Brilliant performance tonight - simply brilliant.

Anybody with a surname of Adams who calls their son Atticus deserves to be sacked if you ask me.

Don't you just love it when the forum bully and chief WUM gets it so wrong. "Lock thread" he says . 290 plus posts later it looks as if the OP was correct to raise this subject again.