Jump to content

egg

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    15,051
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by egg

  1. Get to a game sometime, you'll hopefully get to see you what actually happens.
  2. It's not as simple as that as I'm sure you appreciate. If/where he plays depends who we're playing and form of other players. We could go with 3 up top and he'd go out wide with 2 of Adams, Redmond or Ings. If we set up like we did today its hard to find a place for him.
  3. egg

    Fan's Forum

    1. That's not what was said. 2. An "investment" is not sinking personal monies into a football club. Dumping cash into a footy club for it to sign players ain't an investment.
  4. Better perhaps, but we need pace against Liverpool so Long is much better suited than Ings imo.
  5. Have Cardiff paid the transfer fee yet?
  6. I was. I agree that we're short at defensive mid but I just don't think Reed is up to standard. Slattery is more of an 8 or 10 so he won't offer cover for defensive midfield and and as you say he's more likely to cover more attack minded players. Reed's level is the championship and he's probably a decent cash cow - cost us nothing but other clubs pay him and give us a loan fee. Hopefully he'll do well again this season and get himself a decent move.
  7. You question whether Slattery is good enough but advocate playing a 24 year old who, if good enough, would have made it by now. Having Slattery as our main back up doesn’t suddenly make Reed a PL player.
  8. He's not good enough and it's not helping the lad to keep him around just in case he gets a few minutes here and there.
  9. I'm with you on the last part, Vest is shocking and Stephens just not a PL player. Can't agree on Bednarek though, he's decent and if we're going 4 at the back then I'd pair him with Yoshida who should be playing. The new lad may be decent, but a debut as part of a new back 4 against Liverpool is no time to experiment. Cedric in a 4 is a no from me. Although he has pace, his lack of height would be a major issue, especially of he's marking Origi. Alexander - Arnold would ping crosses to that back post all afternoon.
  10. So a change to a 4 from a 3 at the back, with 3 changes of players, 1 of then to a returning Hoedt or a debutant 20 year old, and dropping Bednarek who was the only CB who emerged from Burnley game with any credit. I know we all differ in opinion, but that's nuts.
  11. Me neither. Its our shirt with our sponsors logo on. Unless that is the point, I don't get the point.
  12. Yep, it's a sorry world, and kids carry stuff they shouldn't. Your point was that searching of the lad going into a footy match was 'improper'. You've now gone off at a tangent. He was searched, that's not improper, it's sensible and necessary. I'm not getting into a wider discussion about searching of youths.
  13. If it's for security at a footy match it's entirely proper imo. We're not talking about some random grabbing his crown jewels in sainsburys.
  14. Seriously? He should have saved the 3rd, and a better keeper would have kept out the 1st. I'm with you on the 2nd.
  15. What's the issue? You know your nipper wasn't carrying anything he wasn't supposed to, but the stewards didn't. People are searched for a reason and I'm not sure why a 13 year old shouldn't get the same treatment as everyone else.
  16. I'm convinced that you've convinced me. I think.
  17. No. Mccarthy is better imo. How he didn't save the 3rd is beyond me. He made 1 save ffs.
  18. He's not suggesting we drop Adams...he's playing him twice!!
  19. That's what's I would do. Vestergard is too slow, Stephens utter sh1te, so don't play either. I'd rather sit 3 in front of a back 4 which has to include Yoshida.
  20. Thanks. Found it. Wish I hadn't though.
  21. Where's today's game mate? I've signed up and watching through lqt but can't see it anywhere...
  22. It's not wrong though. Many of the people who whinge about the shirt will buy it.
  23. Yes, messaged them earlier and been sent link to sideload onto fire box. Will trial next week and then commit to a year if it's decent. Thanks again ?
  24. Cheers Dazza, I'll give that one a go ?
  25. His reasoning leaves much to be desired - our issue, for me, is not firepower but the creativity to supply the forwards plus our defence and limited midfield options. I think he's failed to highlight our actual weaknesses. That said, I disagree about Brighton strengthening, they've had a cracking window. Maupay imo was the standout striker in the championship last season and offers more than Adams and Pukki who'll both do OK but Maupay is a notch above for me. Mooy is slight in build but he's a proven Premier league player who'll create chances galore for them.
×
×
  • Create New...