Jump to content

Lord Duckhunter

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    18374
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Lord Duckhunter

  1. The break up of the union will be a benefit of Brexit, but it’ll probably end up saving it. An independent Scotland & RUK in the EU together is a totally different beast to an independent Scotland when RUK is outside The EU. Of course Brexit gives them something to ramp up the whinging, but when given the chance to put up or shut up, they’ll not have the balls to go it alone. Devolution, not Brexit is the biggest danger to The Union. That’s the next battleground.
  2. The only fantasy is people trying to claim Starmer has somehow done something honourable or courageous. If Dom didn’t get a fine for conducting his eye sight “test”, what on Earth possess people to think Starmer will get fined for a couple of noggins and a Ruby. If they conclude (as they did with Dom) that he broke the rules but don’t fine him, then surely whether he’s fined is irrelevant. I’d bet my bottom dollar that more allegations come out regarding Starmer bending the rules. Somebody in the know will want him replaced and he’s left himself wide open to be stabbed in the back. Anyone who thinks this is a one off is in fantasy world. The rules were so poorly written and so confusing they’ll be more.
  3. Which is why Boris shouldn’t have been fined. He should be treated as an ordinary Joe, not above the law or treated more harshly. Same with Starmer. I’ve been consistent, neither should be fined. Most on here take a different view, they think Boris should be retrospectively fined but Starmer not. I’m pretty sure you’d be using your famous cutting put downs if it was the other way round.
  4. He won’t get a fine. Durham police has previously said they don’t issue retrospective fines to covid offenders. Fucking hell, if they do the lefties will be going ballistic and quite frankly who can blame them? Nobody should be above the law, but nobody should be treated differently because of who they are. Starmer is a slimy hypocrite, but if they don’t issue fines retrospectively, they shouldn’t make an exception for him. If Dom didn’t get one, it’s pretty hard to think what you need to do for Durham police to do so,
  5. So the fact the same police force that investigated Dom are investigating Starmer and the fact that they didn’t issue a fine to Dom,stating that they don’t issue retrospective fines for covid offences has no relevance? Once Starmer said he’d resign if he got a fine from Durham police , Doms previous became an issue seeing as Starner called for him to go despite no receiving a fine from the same force.
  6. Dear god. But you’re right, there was nothing dodgy about it. They’d have done the same with Labour. As Durham police did.
  7. I’ll ask again. What if he isn’t fined, but judged to have broken the rules in a “minor” way (as Dom was). Seeing as he called for Dom to be sacked, should he resign?
  8. Dom wasn’t fined by Durham plod after breaking the rules. Has anyone asked Sir Kier what he’ll do if a similar scenario plays out?
  9. What has he said about a conclusion that there was a “minor” breach of the rules? After all, Dom didn’t receive a fine from the same force after his eyesight testing drive was deemed a “minor” breach of the rules. If I remember correctly he called for Dom to be fired despite not receiving a fine.
  10. 🤣🤣🤣 Tell me it’s an act, you’re not really like this in real life. The Durham police waited until after polling had closed to announce they were re-investigating, it’s why Starmer wouldn’t answer the bird from sky when he knew full well they were. “On Friday”
  11. This doesn’t make sense. If he thinks he should be number 1, what has McCarthy staying got to do with whether he stays or goes. Unless you’re trying to say the offer was to be number 2 to McCarthy. Fucking hell, if that’s the case we really have lost the plot.
  12. I’ve deducted Lawrie a few dozen points for having Shilts, KK, Bally and Steve Williams. Turns out he wasn’t much better than Branfoot.
  13. What about “sacked in the morning”, perhaps they were singing it towards the bloke putting the substitutions on the screen. Not my gut feeling, what I witnessed during, after and in the local pubs on the way home, the away support turned against him Saturday. No doubt about it.
  14. How many points are you deducting Koeman for having VvD, Mane, Jose Fonte & Pelle?
  15. Probably more points than Yoshida & Stephens, who were the pairing when the moaners wanted to watch the Southampton Globe trotters.
  16. 1992 & 2010 were noddy competitions. But yeah, I should have written “in living memory”.
  17. Starmer claimed they carried on working after the food, Dan Hodges claim he’s spoken to a witness who was at beergate. “ I asked my source if it was true that after the curry had been delivered, Starmer and his team went back to work. ‘Of course not,’ the source said.” Starmer also claimed his hotel didn’t provide food and that’s why they eat at beer gate, again proved to be untrue. They claimed Raynor wasn’t there, she was. Again untrue. Boris’ team had after work drinks and food and lied about it. Starmer had after works drinks and food and then lied about it. The only difference is in your response to it. In Dec you called for Boris to resign, long before the police fined him. Yet you’re now claiming we need to wait for the police to conclude their investigations. You’re all over the place.
  18. Absolutely nobody has said he’s a lost messiah, you just made that up. All people are pointing out is that he lost his job having had a better season than Ralph has. If Ralph got us to 8th and a final, some of his fan club would be wanting a statue erected. I’ve seen far far worse performances under Ralph than I ever saw under Claude. The facts are in one season he became one of three men to take us to a cup final, finished higher than all but a handful of our managers and defeated probably the biggest European team we’ve ever beaten. One season….He deserved another one, I’m not sure Ralph does.
  19. Brentford FFS
  20. For all his critics I don’t recall our supporters singing “you don’t know what you’re doing” to Puel. They might not have liked what he was doing, but he had coherent tactical knowledge. Whilst 0-0 home games may have defined Puel, bringing OR on when he did yesterday just about summed up clueless Ralph. It was a genuine collective WTAF from most of the away end.
  21. What a load of old pony. The great lady started the politicalisation of the civil service and machinery of Government , before Blair took it to another level. If you think it all started under Boris you’ve had your head in the sand. What was the WMD timescale, 45 minutes wasnt it? They’re all as bad as each other and have been for 40+ years. Who was it who said “the problem with elections is the Government always gets in”. They’re all fucking liars, the only difference is some get caught and some don’t.
  22. Sad news for us oldies, brilliant in The Sweeney & Minder and was pretty decent on New Tricks. Iconic TV characters
  23. Starmer (and you) called for Boris to resign before the police had decided rules were broken. Yet now you want us to wait for them to decide before condemning Starmer and calling for his resignation.
×
×
  • Create New...