Lord Duckhunter

Harry Kane made that, absolutely superb pass

Keepers got to save that

Brilliant Walker

Correct. His pace is vital & he allows us to switch tactically. To me, he’s one of our most important players.

He’s class,

No, consistent as ever, he’s supporting us now

Who said they wanted Denmark to win. You’re jumping to conclusions.

It’s not subjected to the same commercial pressures. You don’t get threatened with prison if you don’t pay for Netflix

Because it’s Noddy behaviour.

The bbc is is not a commercial organisation.

Who runs it, Soggy?

Piece of piss 2-0

This should be the final word. Soggy, please stop digging.

I could say my house is worth 1.4 million, but if someone’s only willing to pay 450k, it’s worth 450k. Alternatively, I could take it off the market because nobody will pay the asking price. That still doesn’t make it worth 1.4 million.

That boat has sailed.

Who you lose to seems to affect your reputation. Bobby Robson had a pretty average record as England manager yet has this over inflated reputation. A reputation based solely on losing to Argentina, West Germany & Gazza crying. His Euro record was spectacularly awful, failing to qualify in ‘84 and losing every single game in ‘88.

He’s only worth what someone’s willing to pay for him.

So under the Soggy System, If my wonderful new party gets 0.000004% of the uk wide vote, we’ll get 0.000004% of the seats? What if we only get 2 votes, how do those 2 votes count as meaning something under Soggy but not FPTP? You must be the only person advocating PR that won’t accept there will be a floor under which your vote won’t result in representation.

Perhaps he shouldn’t have paid a deposit then.

He’ll be blamed for not picking JWP.

Like FPTP then.

You don’t have to tell me, it’s your mate soggy who seems to be struggling with it. Perhaps you could tell him that under both systems there will be votes that don’t result in representation . There will be a lot less under PR, but there will be some. You can’t say that under FPTP there will be “meaningless” votes, whereas under PR there won’t. Anyeay I’m off canvassing for my new party.

Why can’t the party of their choice follow the example of the LDXAP and give up or change their policies. If my one supporter decides I can’t win a seat, so votes for somebody else, is that not tactical voting? You seem to think that someone voting for a party that doesn’t get enough support under FPTP doesn’t mean anything, whereas under PR it does. This is clearly nonsense. The principle of what a “losing” vote becomes is exactly the same, the only thing that changes is the threshold at which a vote becomes a losing one. Under FPFT it’s not coming first in a constituency, under PR it’s not achieving the required level. There are votes that (in your words) don’t mean anything,in both systems. Thus proving your original point, was indeed pony.

So the same as FPTP then.

I didn’t say anything about premier league experience. All the players you’ve listed were hardened pros, leaders. That’s exactly what we need now.