benjii

Talk about pointing the finger!

He did score a couple last season. I think he's good at attacking the ball. He isn't usually the target but is a good decoy IMO.

I'm hoping that if I continue to provide such insightful observations I might, just might, one day get a job on the radio doing football.

I hope we win.

I don't think there is a point. 'tis just a bit of fun.

Liverpool were awful. Pompey aren't that bad. The officials helped them out.

I agree with this. If we switch to 4-5-1 there's no point having a 3 of James, Hammond and Wotton; too pedestrian. Let James sit, Hammond do his thing and Mellis link with Lallana and Waigo.

It always sounds more dramatic than it really is on the radio. BBC stats say possession is 53%-47%. Leeds are bound to have a few chances. Admittedly we could do a bit more going forwards but 0-0 at half-time is not a problem.

What's the problem?

I've thought about the two propositions and I think I will go for the goal.

We need to be patient. They are good at the back but we only need one chance with Connolly, Lambert etc in the team.

Sounded like a let-off. Let's make them pay.

Sounds like the ref is just rubbish rather than biased.

2-2

Nice gate.

2-0 up. Sack, Sack, Sack!

It's fine - just adjust your volume controls you moaning *****.

Yes it is.

Pompey didn't play any better today than they usually did under Grant. They just came up against an utterly ****e team and got a massive helping hand from the officials when it mattered.

I normally get commentary much earlier than this.

Nope. Although the connection seems fine so they obviously just haven't turned it on yet. Tossers.

I would expect so. It's either that or a radical three-at-the-back!

Great!

Quite unlike frying an egg on a hot stone anyway.

It's in the bag now. Good goal. Unlike the first and the red card which were flukeyus maximus (althought the first finish was good).