benjii

Didn't Fialka say the goal posts were moved last Thursday (ie just before the end of the Exlcusivity Period)?

Him and Lloyd Webber were the other members of Pinnacle. I'm gutted.

Just a ploy to get out of performing IMO.

No one gives a **** and it isn't the first time a football governing body has acted stupidly! As far as people are concerned we are in admin and deserve a penalty. I would agree with that. What we don't deserve is a further points penalty if a 75% majority of our creditors are satisfied, purely because we cannot obtain a specific type of agreement.

If you own a Jacko ticket.

Are you ITK Robsk? Robsk, in the Hall, with the candlestick. Rogered.

To be honest, he hasn't looked well for quite a while now.

This thread sould be moved to TMS immediately. It is in the best interests of the thread, the forum, its users and ultimately Jacko himself.

Precisely.

I'm not expert on CVAs but... (I think) A CVA is a form of exiting admin and recommencing trading. I don't think anyone wants to buy the PLC, ergo it will not exit administration. A CVA is therefore completely inappropriate and unobtainable.

Did he have any views on Michael Jackson?

Shamone! Glad I didn't buy a ticket for one of his gigs.

Any hints? Was it Delap in disguise?

Yes, but a CVA is a process of exiting admin. The entity in admin in our case will be wound up. I expect we could engineer a situation whereby SFC Ltd enters admin and emerges with a CVA, but if the FL insist the PLC has one we are fooked in any case. This is why they were retarded to try and apply their insolvency rules.

Yes, he does. He's breached confidence and told you stuff.

Very true. C'mon, let's 'ave it!

Yes, was thinking the same thing. One money man is quite a different proposition from someone who hopes to use his contacts to get some money at some point down the line, maybe. That's Jacko's modus operandi. at the proposition: Relax, he's a Jew, he's bound to have loads of rich mates.

@ "Rod Stewart", "Andrew Lloyd Webber", "Jim Ratcliffe"

Couple of things: 1) I bet it's not Jim Ratcliffe. 2) I reckon the "Dutch" connection might continue, in name at least.

If you knew she had done it, but it was up to you to convict/sentence her, would you let her off for a blowie?

A&F will be feeling the strong arm of the law soon.

I suspect the situation is that Pinnacle require the FL to accept that their statement that the " rest of the League's Insolvency Rules will apply" is stupid. These rules include the requirement to exit administration with a CVA. The reason it is stupid to try and apply the rules in this case is because the PLC will not exit admin; it will be wound up following an asset sale. This sale is apparently satisfactory to the creditors (or at least a majority who would be able to approve a CVA, were one needed). The point of the rule is to protect creditors; therefore in our case the rule is substantively and pragmatically of no effect or benefit, notwithstanding that it is inapplicable in any case. I suspect Pinnacle are seeking an assurance that no further point penalty will be levied in the absence of a CVA. I suspect the FL are being obstinate old ****s because they fear that an acknowledgment that their Insolvency Rules are inapplicable and ill-equipped to deal with this situation will weaken the pretence upon which they applied the 10 point penalty in the first place. Unerstandably, Pinnacle are not going to waive all and every right of appeal if there is a prospect of a further 10 or 15 points, which would probably equate to relegation, being applied. This would make the proposition before their investor a completely different one.

People are probably scared seeing as how she's 15.....

A Dan Quayle's egg? Be careful now or Cheney will poach it.

Unless the money is used to pay teachers a lot more and recruit the best people (from university, of course), then schools will continue to be the career-play ground of: the uninspired; the plaid target-driven; the intellectually moribund; the unambitious and the unaspirational.