John B

My sentiments entirely. If you started watching in 1966 today's team must have been the worst in the forty two years since.

My sentiments entirely. If you started watching in 1966 today's team must have been the worst in the forty two years since.

A) i am not overly surprised Neither Am I B) i am not overly hopeful of us getting bsck into the game Neither am I C) i am not overly concerned Neither am I D) i am concerned about the way i feel about SFC at present,after 35 yrs i'm really not that bothered. I feel the same as you after 45 years support. For five years we have being getting worse. What happens if we still get worse for the next five years

I dont think I care anymore The team is rubbish .

This must be the worst team in the last fifty years

Yes me too Saw the team on the OS No chance today I feel Relegation only months away

Just Get a life and stop moaning Lowe is in charge and can do what he wants.

Heavy loss and deep in relegation trouble after XMAS

Should it not be Sir Alf surely we have had no other knights play for us

Unfortunately I think you maybe wrong there He is employed to develop the players so that in the future we may prosper something which he is apparently doing quite well If we had a goal scorer things maybe different I realise we have loaned out Rasiak Saga John but this was done for financial John did not score today neither did Rasiak which was not surprising as he was not playing

Ridiculous Post why should JP resign?

Yes

Ivan Golac Mick Mills Stuart Williams Peter Rodriques

You must be joking In the forty five years supporting Saints this pair were nowhere near the top 5 Claus was a lightweight Richards Overated

What were happen to our loans if we were not a PLC?

The successful teams of the 1980s were built on home produced talent plus exceptional good players brought in. Hopefully this will happen in the future

I think Smith was loaned because of Holmes' injury. Perhaps if Best Blackstock Cranie Mills had not gone we would not needed Cork Pekhart Robertson and Pearce. But of course some of the loanees may be better

And Me too The 1976 Man U team was quite strong I was there but could not remember any off them

I thought we had some company looking for investors or has that contract been cancelled

I thought Pekhart was going to be a good loanee.

Are you not a little more confident than a month ago?

Some of your points are correct better supported and more united. But Crouch does not appear to know how to run the Football Club he is a supporter and supporters are not very good at running clubs apparently

I think the team is performing better and the general feeling of the fans is slightly more confident. What is your definition of doing it on the cheap

I would thought it a good date lots of people off work can attend

I think he had to explain to the shareholders why the accounts were in such a bad shape with large losses although some of the language could have been tempered. I think it should have not been mentioned it is an official document. It was not aimed at Crouch personally as although he was there the whole year he was not Chairman the whole time If he had come out in a Newspaper Article I would have agreed