Verbal

With the rest of the smug remoaner elite, I'm off to a concert tonight in Smith Square - Beethoven's Ninth, surprisingly. It should easily be loud enough to be heard in Mogg Towers just round the corner...

After nuclear Armageddon, the only survivors will be insects and Boris's Tory leadership ambitions.

Amen. When are the Cobynista boneheads going to accept the plain evidence that their hero is leading (in the loosest possible sense) them, and the rest of us, into a hopeless wilderness, while the worst Tory government in living memory continues to lead the polls into the coming election? At least individual Labour MPs continue to shine. My MP has just won a seven-year-long battle to protect my local hospital. This is what Labour should be for - but to be really effective, and transformative, they need to govern.

I'm hardly a defender of Corbyn, so the whataboutery is a bit lost on me, Jihadi John. But I don't think Corbyn went further than declaring terrorists in Ireland and the Middle East his 'friends'. Which was bad enough. But your messiah is in a different league.

A 'true Brit' who is a leading member of a Loyalist political gang so extreme that it made the IRA look moderate - the IRA signed the Good Friday agreement; the DUP refused. The DUP was directly involved in setting up the terrorist 'paramilitaries' Third Force and Ulster Resistance.

Says the mug whose fancy dress every day is 'January Sale at Top Man'.

This might be taken a bit more seriously. After all, we've already had one remainer MP murdered by a mad Brexiter. Besides, these weren't keyboard warriors. They were people who'd worked out her address and phone number, and made the threats themselves over the phone. So it's a bit more serious than some raging lunatics threatening people, via a football forum, with piano-wire garrottes or to leave remainers with 'rearranged' faces. In general though, violence is very much a Brexiter thing.

I hate to break it to you but N Ireland voted to remain. The DUP are hardly representative and are so extreme that they made the IRA look moderate. (The latter signed the Good Friday agreement; the former refused).

A Corbyn cultist quoting a barely concealed anti-Corbyn scare piece based marginally on betting odds in the lowest of Murdoch's rags. That's quite funny.

Let's see how many Brexit cultists get bent out of shape over that.

Good graphic Jeffrey. Pity it doesn't show the damage already done. Inward investment down 20% since the referendum, and 25% in manufacturing, which mean that large parts of the economy are freewheeling to a halt. Manufacturing output actually shrank last quarter - and the expectation is that the same will happen this quarter, which means we'll be in a manufacturing recession. Then there's are the small matter of the very small growth we're managing even now. A staggering 1.1% of the 1.4% growth is accounted for by increased consumer debt. That is plainly unsustainable.

So 29th March will come and go without the UK going pop. I could have sworn the jihadists promised us there was no escaping no-deal day...

Interesting developments this afternoon. Is the government about to fall?

Not her either. Even she thinks it's a bad deal because she can't shake the backstop off. There are few heroes in all this. One though is Yvette Cooper, who's used parliamentary procedure to outwit MAY repeatedly - the last time ambushing her by picking up the Spelman amendment. Her successes reflect the fact, which May has pointlessly tried to ignore, that parliament, not the government, is in control (governments only usually appear to be in control because they command parliamentary majorities). All of which points to one of two conclusions: either May HAS to go to an election or a second referendum vote to break the parliamentary jam; or she accepts that parliament must henceforth take the lead. That means, ultimately, a much softer Brexit.

Does the chorus explain how you want us to trade on WTF rules?

So who on here is stupid enough to think that anything is going to happen on 29 March? Oh, and BTW, excellent trolling by Bercow just now. 3rd attempt at getting the withdrawal agreement passed has just taken a massive constitutional hit.

I think it's going great! If you want to demonstrate the strength of feeling behind the Leave Means Leave spaffocracy, seeing ten people trudge through a field does exactly that. If they could chant 'fu ck business' as they traipse through all those industrial estates their message will have got across brilliantly.

And as Tender threatened, it's all kicking off. The Brexit Betrayal March has started with literally tens of protesters. Well, ten. Like the rest of the remoaner elite, I'm petrified.

I was going to post a response to Tender's nonsense but this, plus Shylock's and Jefffey's points cover all the bases. I can only assume there are two stages of withdrawal from the modern world - the turning-up-for-work one and the turning-off-the-mind one. Because it's all so desperately feeble and getting feebler by the day - going over the oldest of ground (eg is it even possible at this point that even a Jihadist doesn't understand what the £39bn is about?). And it IS the rejection of the modern world that's at the heart of this kind of jihadism - the unintelligible technology, the countable brown people running things, the new ideas, etc. It's no wonder that we are left with the worst of all paradoxes: that the people who run this modern world, and are virtually all remoaners, are expected to meekly implement the 1950s by a coddled baby boomer generation who had everything, will lose nothing, and still expect the world to turn around them. As Donald of Orange would say: SAD.

Oh dear. Another of your full-nappy tantrums.

It would. We could possibly then see Labour transformed from the ghost of a party brought to an historic low by incompetents, Jew hater and Putinists, and into something worth electing again.

That'll be a consequence, for sure, but you don't expect the cult to understand this, do you?

Gadzooks! Thou art a cad!

Fantastic. The Jihadists have fu cked Brexit.

Sir Richard Dearlove, the former head of MI6 who, with the CIA's George Tenet, gave enthusiastic endorsement to the dodgy dossier? No, of course not - who on earth would question his expertise? Or to put it another, how much of an utter tw at would you have to be to say that the expertise of Dearlove of all people should not be questioned? And while on the subject of expertise - isn't that something that you, as a fully paid up Jihadist, are supposed to disapprove of?