Danbert

Who cares?

Isn't that just another way of saying tedious and unfounded speculation that just so happens to have been written by a journalist? I can't see it's worthy of comment.

And you find this interesting because...

Copenhagen

They really are deluded. Their manager has just jumped ship because he has no confidence in the club's likely future owners. That should bother them, but no they're still in their fairytale schizophrenic wonderland - a massive club supported by the plucky few bestest supporters, a club that pays wages that are both low and high, and which anyone in their right minds would want to join/jump ship from.

Has anyone been on Pompey Online to gauge the reaction? I'd love to see the fish squirm but unfortunately they kicked me off. What's being said?

wild-saint should be top of the list for ****-stirring

He drives a white Fiat Uno - think about it...

Why would Lawernson or the Beeb give a **** about Saints? Perhaps he was just giving an honest opinion, after all, signing a player of Ramirez' reputation was a bit of coup, so it was a reasonable opinion to hold.

Actually, I have this theory that the BBC deliberately influences the course of matches through negative comments and under-reporting of our goals. It could go some way to explaining our poor start to the season.

For God's sake what's ominous about that - OMG the world's about to end I can't get on the OS...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/oct/30/norway-fa-12th-player-rule-change The Norwegian Football Association (NFF) has a novel idea to even out one-sided matches – if a team go four goals down they can bring on another player...

He got his comment deleted for that - I was trying to have a civilised conversation, but unfortunately it was beyond him...

I'm doing my best - anyone else care to contribute?

As Ken one points about above, and as you seem to have forgotten, we were discussing the creditors from the first CVA. Sure they had an agreement, then Pompey shat on it and them. Then they got another even more derisory offer that, in all probability, also won't be honoured - but that's all right by you because the agreed to it. When an agreement isn't honoured it becomes theft. You can't justify something by saying - well they agreed to it - if you don't honour your side of the agreement.

That, to me, is breathtaking. The creditors agreed to the CVA so it's OK you ****ed them over and didn't pay it? What exactly is your point?

This

Donkey Dowie is Davros

The INTEREST is overwhelming

And this is Saints related because...

OH my GOD... what a load of COBBLERS...

YES... but where from?

My brain hurts

God you are soooo funny.

This - well put mate.