OldNick

I want Hughes tosuceedbut if we were safe and looked at another team in our position and see MH being appointed we would :mcinnes:

QED

oooooh and I was going to post +1

well you have been his buddy on a couple of threads in the last couple of days

I skipped through them as I have the computer on in office and wasn't sure if it would be suitable for customers to hear. lol My first observation was the vocalist/vocalists would be good for ballads. Im not too into rock ,but also felt too much instrumental stuff instead of the vocals. Apart from that pretty good.

That could mean anything with Phil, it could be he has just signed a contract, a golf day anything lol

Jim Bowen RIP

Hypo, I know you are not a bully, we are in the main all decent on here and so let it wash over.

You have strong opinions, and sometimes fail to realise that some others don't want to have aggressive replies . I don't worry myself as its a bit of a game, and accept we want a successful football club

Lol from someone who did waltz off a few years ago

Don't take Hypo to heart Mullet, it would be best that you keep posting so that we get a variety of views.

Hughie, I think you will find that Hypo and Trousers are Forum buddies.

Apparently the WHU fans are loving it on Twitter

Pontypool by the look of it

yep Press association reporting we have opened talks with him. Oh it was so fruitful getting rid of Puel

Press association reporting we have started talks with \Hughes

why are you getting so precious , you didn’t worry using the word cretin earlier

lets hope the club get on with appointing him then.lol Its not about 2 candidates or shouldn't be.

well I much prefer him to return than Hughes be our new man

Speak for yourself lol. If I was one of the other struggling clubs fans and saw last night that we had sacked MP, I would have thought oh s*** and not slept well, then today seeing Hughes was likely to be the replacement I would have slept well again tonight. If any of the other clubs around us had taken on Hughes I'm sure most would have laughed

Ok who wrote that statement, it had to be the Clubs PR people, with the We March On at the end.

well we bloody should do. If we hire Hughes on a 3 year contract and his presence no difference , we then are stuck with him as the club will not want to buy him out of his contract. It is a mess, we need someone who can deal with here and now but also be able to steer the club if we go down. Hughes alreadyhas a large percentage of the fanbase not keen on him, imagine if he doesn't get a response!!!

its not odd, it just shows that some think about the future as well as here and now. Hughes would only be marginally better IMO. His only advantage is that he is different to MP, and just might get the plyers to play a bit different for a couple of games. I'm not sure he is a 2 up front man, and doesn't seem to have the personality to get the players behind him. Anyway the big plus is tht Robbie Savage will be talking us up for the rest of the season, until he gets anti Hughes callers lol

Well if you set your standards as low as Mark Frigging Hughes it shows you aint that smart either. You are right that the club should have changed months ago. Look at the resume of Hughes I pasted above. Not much to set the heart pumping. If he comes then I will back him as I have no choice but I don't expect any real uplift

http://www.whoateallthepies.tv/transfer_talk/164241/top-xi-worst-signings-of-mark-hughes-managerial-career.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Hughes