monkadill Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 If we had started the season with a clean sheet we would be in the same position in the table as we are now! Would that be acceptable? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 do not understand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpturner Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 If we had started the season with a clean sheet we would be in the same position in the table as we are now! Would that be acceptable? what?:confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 That is not ironic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulwantsapint Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Think the idea is that even had we beat Millwall we would still be bottom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Le God Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Think the idea is that even had we beat Millwall we would still be bottom Doesn't make it ironic though. The press use the term so much and always get it wrong. Take note Daily Echo if you are reading this and use a dictionary to see what ironic means Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Even without the -10, we would still be bottom of the table. It's not realy acceptable, is it, but there's a long way to go yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpturner Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Think the idea is that even had we beat Millwall we would still be bottom Why is that ironic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 (edited) You can't beat around the bush, no wins from 6 games and only 4 points is not a good start by any stretch of the imagination. Throw in the -10 and it certainly makes it even worse. I'd like to think we have the players and set up to recover from such a poor start, but there can be no denying that the start so far is anything but good. Edited 5 September, 2009 by um pahars too much cider and kroney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saint_stevo Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 think he means that without -10 we would only be off bottom on goal difference by one goal...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Think the idea is that even had we beat Millwall we would still be bottom but we were always likely to be bottom until october/november unless we won every game and another side lost every game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpturner Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 think he means that without -10 we would only be off bottom on goal difference by one goal...... So no, not acceptable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 His point is, even without the minus 10 we are still the worst team in the league..... one word sums us up - pathetic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colinjb Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Incorrect, we would still be above Tranmere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Incorrect, we would still be above Tranmere. Phew, for a moment there I was worried! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 If we had started the season with a clean sheet we would be in the same position in the table as we are now! Would that be acceptable? You are factually incorrect. However you are right, of course it's not acceptable. But if you think that you can do better.......etc etc. The fact is that we have a new manager and 8 new players who have never played together, coupled with a bunch of kids who only know how to lose because some sick, twisted individual thought he could pay two Dutch clowns a pittance to manage a team of infants. That kind of f*ckup takes time to fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 & people still manage to make excuses...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 How long do they give Pardew? you cannot ignore the fact that he ****ed Charlton up big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genk Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 How long do they give Pardew? you cannot ignore the fact that he ****ed Charlton up big time. Seriously, that isn't the answer to our problems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 How long do they give Pardew? you cannot ignore the fact that he ****ed Charlton up big time. BUT not Reading. i really believe we have to stick with a manager for more than a season to ever have a chance of rebuilding the club, even if it means going down again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
um pahars Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 The fact is that we have a new manager and 8 new players who have never played together, coupled with a bunch of kids who only know how to lose because some sick, twisted individual thought he could pay two Dutch clowns a pittance to manage a team of infants. That kind of f*ckup takes time to fix. I would have to agree 100%. Of course I'm not happy with the start and I'm not overly impressed with today's performance, but given the total Fckfest that was last year, then I'm more than willing to give the new team some time to turn things around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 How long do they give Pardew? you cannot ignore the fact that he ****ed Charlton up big time. good question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 BUT not Reading. i really believe we have to stick with a manager for more than a season to ever have a chance of rebuilding the club, even if it means going down again But do we want to be stuck with another Burley - good record but someone who's had his day and just cannot be bothered. It's too early to sack him but if I was Cortese I would be worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 I think I would have more points on the board if I were appointed.......one thing im sure of is WGS definitly would have. nuff said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 I think I would have more points on the board if I were appointed.......one thing im sure of is WGS definitly would have. nuff said Guff said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadoldgit Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 What is ironic is that were are more rubbish than we have been for decades but the hanging mob still want to lynch a blokes who have nothing to do with the club now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB Saint Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Six games in and the rumblings about sacking Pardew have started. Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitey Grandad Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Six games in and the rumblings about sacking Pardew have started. Unbelievable. Even Poortvliet was given more games than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
once_bitterne Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 but there can be no denying that the start so far is anything but poor. I'd say it was poor..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Six games in and the rumblings about sacking Pardew have started. Unbelievable. some people are better at spotting talent than others? bottom of the league (2nd bottom without -10) out of the cup and playing awful......who do you blame? Let me guess the past? or RL? :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rallyboy Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 current form is all about sticking two fingers up to Mawhinney and showing him that even if he hadn't hit us with the penalty we would still be down there....so the jokes on him.... I think..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint in Paradise Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 current form is all about sticking two fingers up to Mawhinney and showing him that even if he hadn't hit us with the penalty we would still be down there....so the jokes on him.... I think..... Made me laugh I think ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glasgow_Saint Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 current form is all about sticking two fingers up to Mawhinney and showing him that even if he hadn't hit us with the penalty we would still be down there....so the jokes on him.... I think..... Finally an answer...thank you rallyboy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithy Posted 5 September, 2009 Share Posted 5 September, 2009 Joke of a thread...really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70's Mike Posted 6 September, 2009 Share Posted 6 September, 2009 But do we want to be stuck with another Burley - good record but someone who's had his day and just cannot be bothered. It's too early to sack him but if I was Cortese I would be worried. how do you tell fergie had a crap record at united for a few seasons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windmill Arm 2 Posted 6 September, 2009 Share Posted 6 September, 2009 How long do they give Pardew? you cannot ignore the fact that he ****ed Charlton up big time. Did he **** West Ham up? Did he **** Reading up? You are a ****ing mong if you think sacking Pardew is gonna help, ****ing drama queen !!!!! :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 6 September, 2009 Share Posted 6 September, 2009 Doesn't make it ironic though. The press use the term so much and always get it wrong. Take note Daily Echo if you are reading this and use a dictionary to see what ironic means I spluttered when you mentioned that 'Hallowed Publication' :---) and the use of a dictionary within the same sentence! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aintforever Posted 6 September, 2009 Share Posted 6 September, 2009 Did he **** West Ham up? Did he **** Reading up? You are a ****ing mong if you think sacking Pardew is gonna help, ****ing drama queen !!!!! :mad: Try learning to read ****-head, I never said we should sack him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearsy Posted 6 September, 2009 Share Posted 6 September, 2009 circa this forum a month ago: "If only we hadn't got hit with that 10 point deduction! RL really ****ed up our chances of automatic promotion this season. Rosey-cheeked ****." The irony is obvious you retarded mother****ers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now