Jump to content

Drew Surman


krissyboy31
 Share

Recommended Posts

who do we move to the subs bench ?

 

I rate him above Hammond. I know they play different roles, but given choice I'd still probably take a midfield or Surman and Schneiderlin. Come to think of it, I rate him above Schneiderlin too. I can't really say which combination of the three works best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I rate him above Hammond. I know they play different roles, but given choice I'd still probably take a midfield or Surman and Schneiderlin. Come to think of it, I rate him above Schneiderlin too. I can't really say which combination of the three works best.

 

Id rather have Hammond IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am usually good at guessing and my lottery results are always very close.:D

 

 

Reading were after him before and are struggling for fit midfield players.;)

 

 

But my guess is I might be totally wrong.:rolleyes:

 

Happy new years windows.

 

Great Reading can take Surman so we can buy Church off Reading, Church has looked good this season, reckon he'd look better in a saints shirt though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think he would get in the first 11 at the moment. He could arguably replace any of Hammond, Schneiderlin or Puncheon but I don't see him as being a distinct improvement on any of them.

 

He could replace any of those three or even Barnard.

 

We need another quality central midfielder in for next season without a doubt, relying on Schneiderlin and Hammond to stay fit for a whole season is mental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People on this forum used to moan like hell about Surman, and spread stories about his drinking which no one ever proved, why the sudden turn round to want him back? I'm afraid all last year's lot were tarred with a bad brush and I wouldn't want any of them near the place, even though he was local.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People on this forum used to moan like hell about Surman, and spread stories about his drinking which no one ever proved, why the sudden turn round to want him back? I'm afraid all last year's lot were tarred with a bad brush and I wouldn't want any of them near the place, even though he was local.

 

 

I don't remember any stories about Surman's drinking...not one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People on this forum used to moan like hell about Surman, and spread stories about his drinking which no one ever proved, why the sudden turn round to want him back? I'm afraid all last year's lot were tarred with a bad brush and I wouldn't want any of them near the place, even though he was local.

 

FFS what on Earth are you on about? If you actually met the guy you would see that he was probably one of the nicest and most down to Earth footballers around. I don't remember any of those stories. I think you are mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFS what on Earth are you on about? If you actually met the guy you would see that he was probably one of the nicest and most down to Earth footballers around. I don't remember any of those stories. I think you are mistaken.

 

Met him a couple of times also via his brother and he is all of the above.

 

Loves Saints as well, would have him back without any hesitation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was never going to be prem class because he lacks pace... Very decent CCC player and I would welcome him back. Would be a backwards step in his career however.

 

tbf not every prem player has blistering pace. If that's his only flaw then he could still make it as a prem player. He just needs to be used in the right way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

View Terms of service (Terms of Use) and Privacy Policy (Privacy Policy) and Forum Guidelines ({Guidelines})