Jump to content

Schneiderlin + Lambert make Sky Sports Opta "PFA Alternative XI"


Dan83
 Share

Recommended Posts

Erm, also, even the accompanying chart shows that they've ignored Benteke for Lambert, despite Benteke scoring more goals from the same number of shots, which is the criterion they've chosen to use to illustrate Lambert's success.

 

"Without [Lambert's goals] Southampton would be in the relegation zone". Pointless and useless "fact". Had we played every match with 10 men of course we'd be in the bottom 3... who's to say if we'd picked someone else (dare I say someone better?) we'd not have won the League ? The quote is a totally ridiculous statement.

Edited by The9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The9, why do you hate Lambert so much? The guy is a Southampton legend and deserves to get a mention, being the top English goal scorer. I'm sure Lambert's shot/goal ratio must be much better than Benteke as Benteke has about 50 shots a game.

 

I'm ambivalent to him. This isn't even about Lambert, it's about crappy journalism. Read the article, the table used actually tells you how many goals scored and who has the better shot percentage.

 

As for "best English blah blah" it's another genuinely useless "fact". There are not only English players in this competition. Numerous other players have scored more, scored more frequently, completed more passes, assists, etc.

 

Lambert's done well for Saints, and reasonably well for a Prem striker full stop, and much better than some people anticipated, but that's all.

Edited by The9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm ambivalent to him. This isn't even about Lambert, it's about crappy journalism. Read the article, the table used actually tells you how many goals scored and who has the better shot percentage.

 

As for "best English blah blah" it's another genuinely useless "fact". There are not only English players in this competition. Numerous other players have scored more, scored more frequently, completed more passes, assists, etc.

 

Lambert's done well for Saints, and reasonably well for a Prem striker full stop, and much better than some people anticipated, but that's all.

 

Wow. How ridiculous. Nearly as ridiculous as Mcmanamans tackle being a clearance and nothing in it. Jesus christ. Lambert is probably our best ever signing, has an unbelievable goal record, and has brought us through the leagues. i would go as far as saying we wouldnt be here without him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Erm, also, even the accompanying chart shows that they've ignored Benteke for Lambert, despite Benteke scoring more goals from the same number of shots, which is the criterion they've chosen to use to illustrate Lambert's success.

 

They haven't ignored Benteke at all. The article quite clearly says 'Sky Sports delves a little deeper and looks at the Opta Stats to hail some of the names that did not grace the 10-man list of nominees.'. You know, that same 10-man list that Benteke appears on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. How ridiculous. Nearly as ridiculous as Mcmanamans tackle being a clearance and nothing in it. Jesus christ. Lambert is probably our best ever signing, has an unbelievable goal record, and has brought us through the leagues. i would go as far as saying we wouldnt be here without him.

 

I don't have any issue with his successes getting us up to the Prem, and he's done remarkably well considering his lack of experience even this season.

 

However, here's a list of Saints top scorers in the top division since 1983. How is Lambert's total in any way exceptional ?

 

83/84 Moran 21

84/85 Moran 12

85/86 Armstrong 10

86/87 Clarke 20

87/88 Clarke 16

88/89 Rod Wallace 12

89/90 Le Tissier 20

90/91 Le Tissier 19

91/92 Shearer 13

92/93 Le Tissier 15

93/94 Le Tissier 25

94/95 Le Tissier 19

95/96 Shipperley/ Le Tissier 7

96/97 Le Tissier 13

97/98 Le Tissier/ Ostenstad 11

98/99 Le Tissier/ Ostenstad 7

99/00 Pahars 13

00/01 Beattie 11

01/02 Pahars 14

02/03 Beattie 23

03/04 Beattie 14

04/05 Crouch 12

 

Anyway, *I* was talking about how crappy the original article was, and how the stats they gave didn't support their argument, which only mentioned Lambert in passing... if you don't mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They haven't ignored Benteke at all. The article quite clearly says 'Sky Sports delves a little deeper and looks at the Opta Stats to hail some of the names that did not grace the 10-man list of nominees.'. You know, that same 10-man list that Benteke appears on.

 

However, there is no "10 man list" and there are two lists given, both containing 6 players, so without doing my own research to work out that 2 players are on both lists (not mentioned in the article), there is no 10-man list anywhere in that article, just crappy journalism.

 

I will readily accept that I had assumed the "10 man list" was a list of nominees for Player of the Year, and didn't include the Young Player, for which Benteke is nominated. So fair enough on that.

 

Maybe it's better if I use Matt Lowton's interceptions (especially compared to Vertonghen), or Lucas Leiva's tackles as an illustration of them overlooking players then ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm ambivalent to him. This isn't even about Lambert, it's about crappy journalism. Read the article, the table used actually tells you how many goals scored and who has the better shot percentage.

 

As for "best English blah blah" it's another genuinely useless "fact". There are not only English players in this competition. Numerous other players have scored more, scored more frequently, completed more passes, assists, etc.

 

Lambert's done well for Saints, and reasonably well for a Prem striker full stop, and much better than some people anticipated, but that's all.

 

Utter tripe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, here's a list of Saints top scorers in the top division since 1983. How is Lambert's total in any way exceptional ?

 

Well for one, if Lambert scores a single goal in our final matches his total will only have been beaten 4 times in the last 15 years of top flight football we've had. Two more and he'll only have been bettered 7 times in 22 seasons. Not bad for a player with no top flight experience prior to August.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop it :facepalm:

 

What ? Really. I don't dislike him at all, his overall contribution to the club in the past 4 years has been great, he seems like a nice bloke, all that stuff. I don't really think about him more or less than any other Saints player, it's the rest of you all having a different opinion that makes it an issue - and even that's more about how successful I think we'd be with someone else up front than Lambert himself.

 

As I've already noted, Lowton and Lucas Leiva are better examples of the inconsistencies in that article, which presumably in the minds of some on here means I hate Vertonghen, Schneiderlin and Zabaleta as well. :facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well for one, if Lambert scores a single goal in our final matches his total will only have been beaten 4 times in the last 15 years of top flight football we've had. Two more and he'll only have been bettered 7 times in 22 seasons. Not bad for a player with no top flight experience prior to August.

 

Yeah, "not bad", about 2/3rd of the way up the scale of strikers in 22 top level seasons, bettered by 6 other players. I have no problems with it being described as "not bad".

 

Anyway, constantly defending myself on a subject I'm not that bothered about is boring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, "not bad", about 2/3rd of the way up the scale of strikers in 22 top level seasons, bettered by 6 other players. I have no problems with it being described as "not bad".

 

Anyway, constantly defending myself on a subject I'm not that bothered about is boring.

 

Actually bettered by 4 other players not 6, so does that mean he moves from not bad to quite good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not just this thread though. You were the first one calling for him to be dropped.

 

I for one have singled out Lambert to potentially be a player who we look at replacing in the summer, and for me Benteke would be a player to look at.

 

Now, The9 has gone a little OTT. Lamberts contribution has been phenominal, and Ill put my hands up and say I was one of those that said he may not have been the man for us in the NPC. I was wrong.

 

Im not so sure that The9 is being so unreasonable though. For me if we can get a better player in any position we currently have Ill be a happy man. And of course there are better options than Lambert out there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm ambivalent to him. This isn't even about Lambert, it's about crappy journalism. Read the article, the table used actually tells you how many goals scored and who has the better shot percentage.

 

As for "best English blah blah" it's another genuinely useless "fact". There are not only English players in this competition. Numerous other players have scored more, scored more frequently, completed more passes, assists, etc.

 

Lambert's done well for Saints, and reasonably well for a Prem striker full stop, and much better than some people anticipated, but that's all.

 

Ambivalent?!?!?! Scored over 100 goals for the team you supposedly support in 4 seasons and you're ambivalent about him. Remind me to never take any notice of anything you say on here again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it's an alternative PFA 11, you don't nominate someone who has been nominated for a PFA award in Benteke.

 

Correct?

 

Absolutely, yes. Would have been nice to have been informed by the article that's what the "10 man list" they were referring to. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ambivalent?!?!?! Scored over 100 goals for the team you supposedly support in 4 seasons and you're ambivalent about him. Remind me to never take any notice of anything you say on here again.

 

I don't want his babies like some, that's all.

 

I'm ambivalent to pretty much all footballers other than at the exact moment they do the stuff they're good at.

Edited by The9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I for one have singled out Lambert to potentially be a player who we look at replacing in the summer, and for me Benteke would be a player to look at.

 

Now, The9 has gone a little OTT. Lamberts contribution has been phenominal, and Ill put my hands up and say I was one of those that said he may not have been the man for us in the NPC. I was wrong.

 

Im not so sure that The9 is being so unreasonable though. For me if we can get a better player in any position we currently have Ill be a happy man. And of course there are better options than Lambert out there

 

I'm still not passing to you tomorrow. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...