Jump to content

Team for Burnley


AndyNorthernSaints
 Share

Recommended Posts

My problem is it does not matter what side i pick from the 20 odd players ' date=' i cannot come up with one that will stop us falling to physical pressure[/quote']

 

Or one that can find the back of the net

 

Whilst I would move to 4-4-2 I don't expect Jan to therefore based on his formation I would go with

 

Davis

Cork, Perry, Pearce, Skacel

Schnederlin, Wooton

BWP, Lallana, Surman

Euell

With BWP on the right and Lallana in the hole and Surman on the left

Link to comment
Share on other sites

--------Davis

James Cork Perry Mills

-Schneiderlin Wotton

-Surman Euell Skacel

------Paterson

 

Subs: Forecast, Pearce, BWP, Lallana, McGoldrick.

 

Surman on the right isn't ideal but we need to give Lallana and McGoldrick a rest IMO and we need to find a space for Surman, he's the only one who looks like scoring. Surman played some of his best football from the right so if he holds his position well enough then I think he will do well there.

 

The team will probably be more like:

 

----------Davis

James Pearce Perry Skacel

----Schneiderlin Cork

---Lallana Surman BWP

-------McGoldrick

 

Personally I don't think there is anywhere near enough experience in the final third with that team, need to go with Skacel and Euell up there to give us some more muscle and experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- - - - - - Davis - - - - - -

 

Cork - Pearce - Perry - Mills

 

Lallana - Surman - MS - Skacel

 

- - - - Euell - - - BWP - - - -

 

Time for a bit of good old 4-4-2. Drop all this 4-1-2-1-1-2-1-1-2-1-1-2-1-2-1-1-2- formation ******. Keep it simple, have the players in a proven system and play some players who actually know how to play football.

 

Drop James, DMG and Robertson who have been karp for too long IMO. Pearce can stay as I think Palace was just a one off 'Bennett' game.

 

Skacel seems to be the only player who knows the first thing about crossing and can shoot when he gets forward.

 

I never thought I'd say this, but Euell and BWP are our best option up front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as Jan has the bottle to stick to 4-2-1-2-1 and keep the faith then I will be happy. I would go with:

 

----------Davis

James Pearce Perry Skacel

----Schneiderlin Cork

----------Euell

Lallana----------BWP

----------DMG

 

Subs: Paterson, Forecast, Lancashire, Wotton, Mills

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as Jan has the bottle to stick to 4-2-1-2-1 and keep the faith then I will be happy. I would go with:

 

----------Davis

James Pearce Perry Skacel

----Schneiderlin Cork

----------Euell

Lallana----------BWP

----------DMG

 

Subs: Paterson, Forecast, Lancashire, Wotton, Mills

Agreed; as long as Euell is fit his experience could be the key, and unfortunately we have no viable alternative to DMcG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is switching a formation they're comfortable with keeping it simple? These players played this formation for years. I don't recall seeing 2 up front in the youth team. We are struggling to find ONE striker right now, let alone two.

 

Davis

 

James Cork Perry Skacel

 

Schniederlin Wotton

 

Thomson Lallana Surman

 

DMG

 

assuming none of svensson, thomson or euell are fit. or that saga can come straight back after aalborgs season ends tonight.

 

Sorry, but I can't buy the idea that 4-4-2 might be alien to these players. I don't know about you, but whenever I played at school and with friends, 4-4-2 was the default setting.

 

Having one guy up front on his own just isn't working. Especially when that player is someone like Robertson, who just seems to have no impact on the game, or DMG who is lazy and can't hold the ball up to save his life.

 

We do have 2 decent strikers in Euell and BWP, and I think they would compliment each other quite well. Against Wolves, Euell's hold up play was excellent. He showed the strength and composure on the ball that was absent for most of last season.

 

If we have him leading the line, with BWP playing off him and Lallana, Surman and Skacel all supporting from midfield, we may see a few more goals. Otherwise we're going to have a lot more games like Palace, Norwich and Charlton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if 4-4-2 is alien to these players we should at least try it for 20-30 minutes at the end of a game, if we're 1-0 down there is nothing to lose. After all only 4 of our starting 11 are from the academy, I bet the majority of Cork, Euell, Pearce, KD, Perry, Skacel, Morgan and BWP are much more used to a 4-4-2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not alien no, just I don't see it being the magic fix-all being touted on here. Euell hasn't played as a striker for years. His best time was at attacking midfield, which is why I've always suggested putting him in Lallana's position in the current formation. He'd get in the box more, score more and provide more experience in the final third. Lallana can then play wide right or drop to the bench for a while. BWP can compete for wide right or striker. DMG is just a striker. Holmes, Skacel or Surman have to be left wing, and Robertson can leave.

 

But if you're losing a game, or struggling to score at home, it's logical to have 2 strikers on whatever the formation. I'd hope for 4-2-4 with two wide players in that situation. But I'm not convinced we have the strikers full stop. Pekhart hasn't worked out so surely we need a replacement for him.

 

There is no magic fix, but it sure as heck would help.

 

11 league games at SMS this season, 1 win and only 8 goals. Having one up front just isn't working. Saganowski, much maligned last season, scored at a higher rate than anyone in our current squad. One up front just isn't working.

 

I would also disagree that Euell is better in midfield. I thought he always looked at his best up front for the Dons and Charlton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4-4-2

 

Euell Pekhart

Surman Wotton Schneiderlin Lallana

Skacel Perry Pearce Cork

Davis

 

Subs: McGoldrick, Bialkowski, James, Gasmi, Wright-Phillips

 

However, we will play the ****y formation with the one forward and not have any shots again

 

CCC shots statistics

 

1 Saints - On Target 157 - Off Target 136 - Hit WW 5

2 Wolves - 162 - 122 - 10

3 ipswich - 150 - 127 - 14

 

And so on

 

http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/ClubShooting/0,,10794~20087,00.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he's playing mills further forward as he's worried he's too weak at left back. Might be best to switch him and Skacel.

 

I'd worry about a Lallana/Surman central midfield too.

 

But James could definitely play right midfield. He was excellent at times running at the man down the right on monday.

 

maybe drop lallana for this one..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schnierlein was meant to be fit for one of the last two games but ended up playing neither and was not mentioned on the os report of the team selection for Palace.

 

Given that is's getting near to January and he's been rumoured to be one of the ones sold is it safe to assume he isn't likely to be risked in what is left of Dec and we have seen the last of him in a Saints shirt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davis

Cork, Perry, Pearce, Skacel

James/Thompson, Schneiderlin, Lallana, Surman

Euell, Paterson/BWP

 

 

Hope your wrong Once Bitterne, he is the key to our team. We need as many points on the board as possible before January, presuming we will lose a number of players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schnierlein was meant to be fit for one of the last two games but ended up playing neither and was not mentioned on the os report of the team selection for Palace.

 

Given that is's getting near to January and he's been rumoured to be one of the ones sold is it safe to assume he isn't likely to be risked in what is left of Dec and we have seen the last of him in a Saints shirt?

 

More likely that Jan didn't want to aggrivate his hamstring injury. No point rushing him back again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lallana and McGoldrick need a bloody good talking to. Their roaming all over the pitch, like playground football, chasing the ball, is destroying our ability to score goals.

 

They either have to play in the manner their designated position requires, whilst being self disciplined enough to get into dangerous positions or leave them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What did he do? Good touches, looked lively, generally did well

Playing out wide,did he beat his man? Was played out of position. Even if he had, no-one to cross it too, maybe why he looked up and came inside.

Did he get to the byline and put in a decent cross? To who exactly?

Did he win any headers? Not sure that he is likely too, not really a valid question IMO, how many headers do wingers win?

Was he a goal threat? Our best chance of a goal IMO, looked sharp.

Was he offide often? No more than anyone else i dont think

Did he lose posession mostly? No. One miss control from a Wotton pass seems to stick in peoples memory. Skacel had a couple similar.

Did he get subbed? How does that even matter?! DMG didnt get subbed and he was carp

 

 

Seems he is being persecuted for previous poor performances

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all. BWP has been good on occasions but is not an effective winger.

I would rather Skacel, Surman, Holmes or Dyer player out wide.

 

seeing as tho the former 2 are much needed in current positions and the other 2 are injured and out on loan. Not much choice.

 

Again though, i draw your attention to who is going to be in the box when this crosses are delivered?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...