Jump to content

No more gambling companies on club shirts


Saint NL
 Share

Recommended Posts

pMp42Qe.jpg

 

• Bournemouth - Dafabet (online bookmaker)
• Brentford - Hollywoodbets (online gambling firm)
• Everton - Stake (online crypto casino and sports betting platform)
• Fulham - W88 (betting firm)
• Leeds - SBOTOP (sports betting firm)
• Newcastle - Fun88 (online sportsbook and casino)
• Southampton - Sportsbet (online gambling company)
• West Ham - Betway (online gambling firm)

 

A good thing imo.

Not sure what that means financially though.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The Kraken said:

“From the front” seems quite a pertinent statement. Wouldn’t be surprised gambling ads allowed on warm up tops and on matchday shirt sleeves…

On the backs of shirts under the numbers, on the shorts front and back and on the front and backs of socks, and running down the arms of any long sleeve shirt. 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Saint NL said:

pMp42Qe.jpg

 

• Bournemouth - Dafabet (online bookmaker)
• Brentford - Hollywoodbets (online gambling firm)
• Everton - Stake (online crypto casino and sports betting platform)
• Fulham - W88 (betting firm)
• Leeds - SBOTOP (sports betting firm)
• Newcastle - Fun88 (online sportsbook and casino)
• Southampton - Sportsbet (online gambling company)
• West Ham - Betway (online gambling firm)

 

A good thing imo.

Not sure what that means financially though.

About 65 million less per season in the Premier League economy I suppose.

Good thing for football though and the betting sites will easily find other media to take their money.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Discussed on The Price of Football podcast. Front of shirt only, Big Six don't have gambling companies as main sponsors anyway as they can attract bigger fish, for the rest the sleeve sponsor will probably now attract a higher sponsorship fee than the shirt front.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Wurzel said:

Discussed on The Price of Football podcast. Front of shirt only, Big Six don't have gambling companies as main sponsors anyway as they can attract bigger fish, for the rest the sleeve sponsor will probably now attract a higher sponsorship fee than the shirt front.

Which is likely why it's happened so easily. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good to see none of the Big 6 have betting sponsors as their main shirt sponsor. Therefore it would only affect fodder clubs who don't really matter, and Newcastle who don't need the money anyway. And it's years away from happening, so no excuses to not find deals elsewhere (from other sponsors, or on other parts of the kit). Another morality win for the Premier League 😇

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you see the damage betting does to vulnerable people (including footballers and people who are easily manipulated, which is plenty), this is about time.  Betting, no problem, but these muthafucks make it way too easy for people to get in serious problems, and football just takes the money and hasn't given a shit for too long.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...