CB Fry

I think he would be a very good signing if we can get him in for £10m. I'd expect Pelle to push him hard for his place. Austin's had a great season, but Graziano might rise to the challenge.

What are you on about? You're saying Koeman hasn't had a chance to assess Ramirez where he clearly and obviously has. Let's remember who decided to carry on a debate with me from one thread onto a different thread, and this is now three separate threads you're trying to have the same argument with me on. You to me, not the other way round. Get over yourself.

How's the "development" of Dani Osvaldo going? All those "development" loan moves he's had must only be great for SFC when he comes back all developed and everything. Ramirez has no future at Southampton. If Koeman wanted to see how he could develop as part of a Premier League team then I reckon there is a Premier League team that he could have kept him in.

Remind me which manager bundled him off to Hull on September 1st after being the manager of Southampton for two and a half months?

This. Just because we were 3rd halfway through the season doesn't mean we were ever going to stay there. If it was, say, Pelle, out for the season in March rather than Forster the season in would likely have panned out about the same, just with a different "If only...." angle.

They could do a lot worse to be fair.

UKIP have no mandate on anything, in the European parliament they are irrelevant. They don't have more of a mandate than anyone else (or other parties don't gave less of a mandate than them), they don't have a mandate. Except in Thanet where they run the council. Check them out. Oh and that MP who looks like a sheathed penis. He's got one hell of a mandate.

Oh aye. With statements like that I'd say they are more likely to be the next QPR than the next Saints.

Possibly very stupid. They just needed to guarantee Premier League football for one more season, and for all his faults Sam would do that. Hey, it might work and I'd say Brady and co have looked a similar sized club who have chopped and changed their managers with phenomenal success. Now who might that be....?

Big Sam in.

No, you've never posted anything of consequence. My original post of "don't do that" was entirely to prevent misunderstanding as you describe, so it's not me that needs the lecture. Cheers.

It's fair to say I have no recollection of anything you've ever posted.

You did it twice in about ten minutes, is the point.

...says the man saying "Thank **** for that!!!!" because someone posted a picture of a nun. Fu cking simpleton.

I would have wanted Arsenal to win anyway.

Come on the Arsenal.

Newcastle staying up being described as a "fairy story" by Stelling. Dear god.

I'm watching SSN, but even when I watch streams this thread is usually ahead of time. How about just you not posting sh it?

Do you spend every match thread purposely putting up posts suggesting we've scored?

Don't do that.

Shame Brendan's pasting at Stoke may well be for nothing as far as we're concerned. Can see him sacked for it though.

Err, not that obviously.

No I'm not. Just saying that UKIP did not and do not have the mandate you say they have. I'm just saying you're wrong. The extrapolations you're wheeling out above are a total irrelevance to my central point.

Solidarity with Pap after he was banned, it seems. A huge miss. He did it in the right way, though. No threatening to leave, no grandstanding, just went off into the sunset of Pap's new site. Oh, and he changed his avatar too (one last LOLZ). Hopefully he'll come back in time.

So its "a nonsense" for parties winning millions of votes, hundreds of seats and clear majorities in general elections to claim a mandate but the 4.2m that voted UKIP in the last European election (about half as many as voted for Labour and Tories that same day) is a mandate. Okay then. 24 UKIP seats vs over 40 seats for other parties working to stay in. Some mandate there and no mistake.