Patrick Bateman

That's very true, forgot about that!!

Yep, I don't bother anymore on every fill up, but I do use it when I can based on the fact they do say it is better for the engine. But then, I picked up a new AMG in October and I actually asked the dealer this very question, he said 95 or 97 is fine ... so I'm still erring on the side of "Emperor's new clothes" a little

You may get marginally more MPG, but I think it's a bit of Emperor's New Clothing at play. When I had my last 350z, BP were then doing an Ultimate 102 - which was ridiculously expensive. All it seemed to do was make my already loud car, louder. I didn't notice more MPG or hidden BHP.

I was going to say that. I watched Benefits Street as nothing else was on and it was 9pm. I didn't (and probably won't ever) watch Immigration Street as it was 10pm and I was in bed.

I think she's actually Dear Deirdre from the Sun ...

Anyone waiting for a woman to make the first move needs to man up! Simple as that.

To be fair, Coxford_Lou did use the word "potential". I agree, they do like they have the potential, but that's why we have them on loan to start with and if they turn out well and sign up, then exciting times.

EVERYTHING THAT IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE IN THE UK, in one sentence. "Benefits street STARS" ... STARS? FFS.

So in answer to my earlier question, you're looking for something based on sex & looks, not long term? You can look "hot" in business dress or decent jeans + top etc., doesn't need to be revealing at all - unless of course it's not a long term thing you're after ...

Yep, met my wife on one. Also a great way to meet some complete odd balls and get some decent stories along the way, from the sort of people you'd never ever bump into normally.

Depends what you want? A short-term thing based purely on sex and looks, then go for A+B. If you want something meaningful and lasting then avoid at all costs and just dress normally - nice jeans and a nice top is fine. Not too much make up either.

Not hard to find in a Dictionary to back up what you're saying either; http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/mong

I don't think I've ever come across anyone as literal as you, ever. FFS.

That was quite amusing. No idea what planet Rodgers is on now, but he has certainly caught the "Complete and utter helmet full of self-importance disease" now. It's getting worse. Terminal.

I went for the 06:54 from my station this morning and noticed that when I got to the platform, my usual train (after the 06:54) was cancelled for seemingly no reason. Crawled through Wimbledon with no explanation. Arrived at Waterloo 8 minutes late, with no explanation. Got into the office only 5 minutes before I would have done, FFS. Now catching up on Saintsweb and emails, with coffee at the usual time.

JWP is a tough one for me, he is undoubtably a great player, but I do think he needs a bit more bulk - having said that, his barge on Lallana was amusing.

Not good enough. Nothing more to say than that - can't even blame the ref, just not good enough in front of goal. Again. Same as last season really.

Can't be bothered to watch it, why do I want to want to watch a bunch of LFC players talk tripe?

And that is more concerning now our defences have been cut in half, cut in half again and cut some more.

He buys nice curry with your money ... (sorry Steve)

Hmpfh. I've lost my touch obviously. I was moaning to SteveGrant tonight (in person, over curry) that I'm 39 this year and feeling ancient, obviously losing my touch on trolling too.

And why won't you rise to my baiting? This is very disappointing

Come on, man up.

You lot are weird. Plus, no one answered my original point from earlier, that the journalism was p*ss poor. It's such a horrendously written article, but obviously that doesn't matter.