aintforever

Would be fantastic if Roma come back to knock the scouse ****s out but I can’t see it.

No, but obviously being better at English improves your communication skills.

... for about 10 minutes, then City start to massively swing our goal difference.

I guess some are more effected by immigration than others. There is plenty of ignorance among those who favour mass uncontrolled immigration regardless of its consequences.

As it stands they still have to produce a programme, looks like they are voting in June wether to change the rules or not.

To be fair he came in at a ridiculously late stage of the season and took over a team devoid of confidence and a pretty horrible set of fixtures. If he keeps us up he will have earned the right to be here next season without a doubt.

Agree, you can't trust Arsenal away from home. I think we need to be at least a point above Huddersfield going into the last game to stand a decent chance of staying up. I would take them needing to beat Arsenal but if they only have to scrape a draw then we're in the poo.

It's unlikely but the bottom 10 could look like this going into the last day, a right royal rumble: Palace 38 Southampton 38 Bournemouth 38 Watford 38 Brighton 37 Swansea 36 West Ham 35 Huddersfield 35 Stoke 33 West Brom 31

True. Can work the other way though, if they all mess up then it should give our lot a boost.

Massive result yesterday but it’s still going to be tough. 4 points should hopefully be enough but one good thing is that we play Everton at 5.30pm so should have a better idea if a point is any good or not at kick-off. The City game is a right-off so we need 4 points from our next two on the road so it’s a big ask.

He’s showing that if we had even a half decent manager since the start of the season we wouldn’t be in this mess.

**** me that was tense!! Great result, start of the great eascape?

Signing Lambert was not a gamble, he had already banged in 29 goals in the same league for Bristol Rovers the season before.

Guess what, it is all over.

To be fair, all the Saints managers seem to pick him then drop him.

I think any deluded idiot that thought it would be a good idea should be top of the redundancy list. I've been to a few of these and the idea of it taking place after that shower of ****e gets us relegated is bizarre. They could always rename it the End of Season Shame Awards, and give prizes for the Worst Attempt at Goal, Worst defensive decision, Most Overpaid Player etc. With a special "Les Reed' Award for the worst managerial decision in the history of The Premier League.

Don’t you mean after the clubs ambitions / financial constraints changed NC jumped ship along with the other rats?

I’ve got mates who are not Saints fans but go to St Mary’s, and Fratton when they were in the Prem. One is actually a Pompey fan but because his kids want to watch Premier League games he has to take them to see Saints which is **** funny.

Well that’s a start. Even if it’s bull**** at least someone is saying something.

Good to see Gao has his finger on the pulse of the important issues at SFC. Should be great preparation for the physical demands of the Championship, a few friendlies against a bunch of 5ft tall Chinamen.

They are not deliberately cheating but there are always decisions where there is a degree of doubt and there is more pressure on them to give the decision in favour of the bigger club. Not sure wether it is getting worse or not but I think it is vital for clubs like us that VAR is introduced, that won’t stop the bias but should definitely help.

You always have these problems at these big games when the fans are all mixed up. Some fans like to stand up, sing and swear, others like to sit in silence with their thermos and Tupperware- there is obviously going to be a conflict. It would make sense if the club nominated a certain few blocks for the boring, family types - it would make it a better experience for everyone.

Surely it’s the clubs that decide how to sell their tickets? Chelsea fans have been able to buy two extra tickets per membership all week.

You are just making stuff up now, what happened over Iraq doesn’t mean our government are purpetual lying scumbags but the fact that they lied before means that it is possible that they may lie again. No doubt you were taking the **** our of the mad conspiracy loons who suggested that WMDs didn’t exist in Iraq? You often never know the full truth of what happens in war so I don’t have a problem with the strikes on Assad but that still doesn’t mean you shouldn’t do all you can to find as much evidence as possible. The idea that it was a British false flag is nonsense but who knows what is going on in Syria. There are so many different groups in conflict and many in desperate situations - if chemical weapons ended up in the hands of the wrong people who knows what can happen.

**** me, just because one doesn't believe everything our government says doesn't mean they are are on anyone's side. It doesn't make you a conspiracy loon to want to question the evidence, it just makes you intelligent enough to realise there are a lot of people with different agendas. By your rationale, everyone who was correct about Iraqi WMDs was on the side of Saddam Hussain.