Weston Super Saint

Hi Will. Welcome aboard

It would appear he has completely discounted a certain other club in the South in the Championship!

Only, he doesn't believe it was a 'poor showing'.

It's not even 'his' account. It's an account associated with a football game that he has access to. No wonder senior figures at SFC are beating his door down for his opinions

Immediate fail!

🤣🤣🤣

I'm going to go with, either an Everton fan or the return of the Klopp.

Welcome to our world!!

Fixed for you.

So, to summarise. This is someone asking you about the Football Manager game who just happens to have worked at SFC once upon a time. Very different from your claim that 'influential people at Southampton football club are lining up to get your opinions on the club and football in general' 🤣 Nice one Walter Mitty!

There is no evidence he was communicating with you. Not sure why you can't grasp this. Also, he doesn't appear to be asking the person who he is communicating with's opinion on football, it seems to be related to a 'game'. Even 'if' he is communicating with you, it certainly suggests you are bullshitting when you claim these people are after your football insights.

Well done. You've provided evidence that someone has had a private conversation with someone who doesn't work at SFC! There is zero evidence that the person who doesn't work at SFC was communicating with you - he could have been communicating with anyone! You have not met the burden of proof. Another fail.

I'm not. I just don't believe that happened with you - you could easily provide evidence (redacted) if it happened. But you won't. The most obvious explanation for that is because it didn't happen.

Bullshit. I answered your question by saying I don't care why they follow you. The reason why I believe they may follow you but not engage in a conversation (except the imaginary ones in your head), is because you are an absolute weapon.

I don't care why they follow you. I don't doubt they do - I don't have an X account so can't check either way. I doubt they've engaged with you - other than becoming cyber contacts - and you have provided no evidence that they have. I'll leave you to your imaginary conversations, Walter Mitty.

It all feels a bit same old same old. We've had a manager before who's first task was send the players off for a nice holiday. That didn't end well...

Because you've failed (once more) to provide any proof. At the moment all we have is your word - as H&W has pointed out, that is increasingly worthless given all the lies you keep being caught out telling. Why should we accept your word without any evidence when you stubbornly refuse to accept the word of the Holy Bible - citing there is zero evidence? Either you want to live in an evidence based world or you don't, you can't pick and choose to suit your own agenda.

Just goes to show, the CoT always delivers ahead of schedule.

As predictable as a first generation AI bot. They were private so I can't show them - aka they're made up and I have no proof.

You heard it here first

Which you can screenshot to prove of course - but you won't citing that they're 'private' to carry on the pretense they really did engage with you even though they didn't.

None on X then! Quelle surprise.

Wow. You're incredible. They follow you on social media. You've really hit the big time, well done you. How many have actually engaged with you? I'm guessing none...

I do not believe this is true. You can ignore posts, messages or mentions - e.g. @Matthew Le God from posters. You cannot ignore posts from your ignored poster that were quoted by other posters.