Saint_clark

Absolute rubbish and a complete rewrite of what actually happened. Instalment plans - everyone said it was a bad idea to remove them. Everyone. But some of us were willing to wait for a reason before we slated the club for it. Photographers ban - again, everyone was against it and a little embarrassed at the reaction of some of the media. And what exactly does your last sentence mean? What did Cortese admit "wasn't OK"?

Yeah, SP2 seems to have gone offline...

Newcastle fans leaving already

Awesome, nice work. The quality is fantastic - definitely the one to use.

All 3 channels all the time?

Your colour coded response was miles better than mine

Instalment plans - it was questioned massively at the time, but a reason has been given. Freezing out of legends - rubbish. No-one has been told they are not welcome. Photographers ban - Cortese has gone back on this decision and admitted he was wrong. And ONE fan has been told he can't be a season ticket and we have no idea what for - it's not like fans are being banned from attending en masse.

Justintv will have it on.

He is not banned.

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?27964-Database-issues-unacceptable&p=953784#post953784

Damn it...

Well if this happens we'll never know anyway...

In fairness, he's now 35. I'm pretty sure 10 years ago he would have been a useful player at our level.

As you said, Cortese acknowledged in the interview he did that the club hasn't been very good at communicating with the press/fans. And if you're worried about the fans forum, have you tried emailing or calling the club?

Everyone agrees that an explanation should be provided. But some of us aren't going to condemn the club until we hear the reason...or until no reason is given.

Of course we will all criticise him when it's due, but "plenty" not so good? I can think of one thing - charging the newspapers for the use of photos. We all knew that was silly at the time, and he's turned around on that.

And the Barnard one.

Considering he's done all of two interviews since he took over the club, i'm interested to know what your dictionary says for "constantly".

"Shielding" the ball requires you to be in control (i.e within playing distance) of it. Nardiello wasn't, so it was obstruction.

I'm sure the vast majority of their customers don't buy sky just for Premier League football.

What if it turns out that he is one of the people working behind the scenes to discredit the club?

The last two have been explained - instalment plans were withdrawn because lots of people in the past have got their ticket and then just cancelled the payments. They're bringing in a swipe card system in the near future. And the match photos thing was a misunderstanding with the press, and we no longer charge for them.

Terrible camerawork for the N'Guessan/Barnard chance.

No, but it does matter if you're interfering with play - the pass wasn't intended for someone on the other side of the pitch, BOTH players ran through the middle. They were about a yard away from each other.

Can only see them from a distance, and the "assets" put them at 18 at least And it doesn't matter about the bloke who scores, the pass was meant for someone who is offside and was less than a yard away from receiving it.