Fan The Flames

I guess he did include 'value for money'. But you are right the US pharma companies will want to sell their drugs at a higher rate then they can now. Currently the NHS drives a hard bargain on what it is prepared to pay for medicines and it's the NHS users that benefit by more money being available to go into service provision.

Are you suggesting that farming community are getting polling cards for their chickens, is that how all the rural Tory MPs get in? Labour are against voter id because they dont think that there is a problem to solve, 1 conviction last time, and that it will disproportionately affect labour voters. The Tories claim it was a recommendation by European electoral observers, but so was limiting donations but of course the Tories don't want to bring that in.

What a load of ********.

So what it they believe the Portsmyths, the SCUM stuff doesn't stand up to any scrutiny. The pompey lad said it himself that you can choose what to believe, people like their world view to be buttressed by facts even fake ones. Portsmouth and Southampton are more working class then most places in the South and it's s a rivalry between two different manors and that is why it is less intense for us that didn't grow up there. The film might not tell you anything you didn't know but it was a good watch and nice to see us the focus of something.

How have you worked that bit out?

instead we have a bunch of blossoms

You do realise that these posts make you look like a 40 year old virgin.

And he's got working men arguing that a four day week shouldn't be an aspiration in modern times for one of the richest country's in the world. The Eton elite must love having this army of saps.

He wasn't equating them, he was simply illustrating the likelihood of one happening by comparing it with the other. Obvs.

Isn't that because they are not Indians, they are not from India. You've answered the point in your brackets.

That article is more than an appeasement piece about who we are going to buy, its an explanation piece of where the trouble lies and places the blame squarely at the feet of the players. It alludes to player dissatisfaction with the manager as being at the heart of the problem and the bit about buying new players is less about appeasing us and more of a signal to the players that Ralph isn't going anywhere. Shape up or get ****ed off. How correct the piece is or how correct it is to put it out there is up for debate.

That's more ridiculous than last nights scoreline.

I agree with above regarding us footballistically, but it's true that we may have ended up with a **** 80's stadium.

They probably did, but they weren't going to admit their mistake.

In Black Eyed Peas?

Surely the Spurs one was a simple error by the controller, you talk as though you've never pressed the wrong button and sent a porn link to one of your clients, ffs.

The state broadcaster of an authoritarian surveillance state is called CCTV, thats just taking the ****.

I seemed to recall that the stadium proposal on the Toys R Us site was turned down in part because the area was prone to fog, which always sounded a load of ********.

It's all the fans fault.

Good for them, they will be the first club ever to have a training ground better than their actual ground.

At least he takes the cups seriously.

He played a couple of lovely through balls tonight that led to goals.

What is strange is that he was presented as a prgressive attacking manager when he clearly was the opposite. He really was a **** up. But Les and the management team were sold on this idea that if you kept getting of managers you could build something bad into the culture of the first team. I remember this being alluded to in an interview with Les, that the team could develop the habit of choosing when to play for a manager and any manager could be dispensed of by the first team at their choosing. So they stuck with MP far longer than they should have done, trying to break this perceived cycle. Maybe backing the manager with a player of his choice was an extension of this approach. They got out of jail with Mark Hughes and then compounded their mistake by giving him the full time gig. The management did make some big mistakes.

This has happened already, it's definitely happened once if not a couple of times.

Just google it, Sheffield rules were everything to do with a region, they were a regional set of rules and not the basis of the rules of football, they existed for a short period before being ditched by the region for the FA set of rules. Yes they preceded the FA rules and yes both rules co-existed for a short period and they influenced each other but the dominant set of rules were the FA rules, and these never allowed goal hanging. Goal hanging was allowed under Sheffield rules for a short period and was even ditched before their demise. Football has always had offside and slowly over the years the balance has moved from favouring defenders to being equal. They are simply the facts. What are you talking about lines didn't exist in the 80's, chatting ****.