Fan The Flames

We were ****, but you don't need to have seen it before to know that.

Once after I finished a **** I opened my eyes to find out that there were other people on the bus.

Maybe the audience that they want it to appeal to isn't you miserable ****s.

Or maybe it should be no one out and give them all the opportunity to put things right. After all you are moaning that their poor recruitment failed to replaced their earlier good recruitment.

The club got stung for the tickets one time too many.

Or Barry Fry, English and would both would command respect and are technically flexible.

Roy Evans

You've keep a record of everyone's opinions do you, you sad ****. St Fred is right, they are different people, unless of course you can post up a few examples.

Surely Everton will be the first, to add to their enviable list of football ground achievements.

so are running costs. Would this be simply be a name change thing due to the change of ownership.

....or having the same set of players.

You could argue that English big club losing rate which is double that of the Spain is because there are twice as many big clubs in England than Spain. But I take your point that there is more depth in England than Spain and this is part of the appeal of the Premier League.

They didn't look on here then.

Phew I thought this was going to be about MLT chucking in his support because we can't score.

Modern football fans eh, using the poetic grammatical sentence form in a discussion on football atmosphere. If you are the authority on intimidating atmospheres we have no hope.

There was a thread on the badge on the message board before this one (what was that called again) and Rolland Parris' son/ grandson came on and said the tree represented the green parks of the city. Growing up outside of Southampton I had always assumed that the tree represented The Dell, not being aware that most believed to be the for the New Forest.

So a post talking about last seasons final with Man U, with a video of the game with Man U prompted by our upcoming game against Man U is some how a post about Crystal Palace in the minds of the hard of thinking on here. DS theory goes like this, we played well in that final so with the similar personnel that we have we should be capable of recreating it, even more so with the introduction of two better players (given that part of the evidence for this is a game against Crystal Palace, this must be the bit that is causing your confusion). You can agrue that he is wrong but you can not say that he is wrong because CP are ****, because he didn't say we can be good because we beat CP he is saying we can be good because of how we played in the final against Man U. It is the Gaston Ramirez argument, where you believe that there is a good team there it's just knowing how to unlock it, but there is only so many matches that you can give it before you sack it off.

What a load of old ********, PSG won't make any money from kids in Indian wearing fake tops

It just sums you up, your over eagerness to indulge in negativity. Well it wasn't uncomfortable was it, yes we are still a work in progress and we need to sort out the attack, but we were playing well.

Alpine wrong again.

The tree represents the parks of the city not the New Forest, as confirmed by the designers son on here years ago. i love the badge and would be very upset to see it change.

Well you look good for your age.

So why wasn't Lowe able to push on.

I would suggest that they are as many older fans who are anti Les Reed as there are younger fans. Take Vectissaint for an example, I don't know his age but he sounds old.

I would like a couple of examples from your life where you have set yourself high targets and then achieved it.