Source?
You cannot quote random figures without some genuine data to back them up. And to say “4,000%” is beyond amateurish and no professional statistician would ever express an increase in those terms. Any percentage should be a fraction of a hundred. The clue is in the word. If you mean increased by 40 times then you should say so.
Reductio ad absurdum.
Don’t be so ridiculous. We finished 11 points, effectively 12, from safety.
I ignore the so-called stats because they are an irrelevant nonsense.
And what makes you think I am defending him?
No and yes.
And like you say, even the casual observer can see the difference between the good and not so good player. We don’t need any stats to know that Baz is not top drawer.
That’s exactly my point.
I have spent my professional life using technology and I have a good understanding of statistics and stochastics. These methods are the sort of stuff that gamblers use to try to justify whether to bet on red or black.