Jump to content

Whitey Grandad

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    29,545
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Whitey Grandad

  1. That’s because it is a chore
  2. Of course it’s risky. And stupid. The slightest mistake and it costs us a goal. When do we ever have four players in the opposition penalty area? If the thinking behind this system is to draw the opposition in then it’s working. Once they have been drawn in then we are supposed to have more room to break free and counter but the exit pass never comes because it’s not allowed to. I wonder if Martin’s preference for five at the back is because he wants his defenders to be closer together to make the passing between themselves easier. For this reason alone he should go. He simply doesn’t like us to be attack minded.
  3. I’m sure you’d like it to be 🥴
  4. Yep always leave a player or two upfield. My neighbour Ivan Golac (name drop) said that he like to leave three upfield because then the opposition had to mark them with four.
  5. The system exaggerates any mistakes and makes them more likely to lead to goals conceded. Even less talented players can be drilled to produce a tight defence. Defending is easier to coach than scoring goals but this posturing imposter has never been able to do that wherever he has been. I have no doubt that a more competent and experienced manager would have us set up better defensively. I don’t think we’d survive but we would at the least have made a fist of it.
  6. Enough talent to get into the lead but not enough talent to defend it?
  7. Exactly. And we all know why that is.
  8. Football has been around since medieval times. The Laws of the Game have been in effect since 1863. It is played by over 240 million people in more than 200 countries. It has developed into the beloved sport that we all used to love. Until now. Russell Martin is no new Messiah. His beloved style sucks the life and passion out of the game. The one and only objective of it is to score more goals than the opposition and you will never do that by playing pass the parcel in your own penalty area. If there were some radical new way of playing the game it would have been found decades ago. The longer this farce goes on the more I hate Russell Martin for what he has done to our club.
  9. As have we all. Well, some of us anyway.
  10. Players are just that. Players. Some are better than others. But a team is greater than the sum of its players.
  11. Same here. Going to the game used to be an escape from the turgid regularity and boredom of everyday life. Now it’s the other way round.
  12. With the new Inheritance Tax changes coming in there must in some cases be an incentive to get rid of the old git a few weeks early.
  13. So who will be left? Will we have enough to make a team?
  14. Because he enjoys the risk element. He gets a buzz out of it. It’s effectively a gambler’s high.
  15. Martin is responsible for the system that makes such mistakes more likely and more catastrophic when they inevitably occur. A related if not directly comparable situation occurs in Employment Law where it’s something known as the Principle of Vicarious Liability.
  16. “In the cat” more likely.
  17. But if they didn’t take risks he couldn’t call them brave.
  18. But are they buying them or laughing at them?
  19. Which one, there are so many candidates?
  20. Times change, and we change with them.
  21. By ‘this garbage’ I was referring to the style of football. And why would you think that promotion was likely? We scraped through last time but that’s no guarantee of future success.
  22. And the pair of them are then playing the opposition onside.
  23. Oh God! Not another season of this garbage. And please don’t go on again about last season. That is no longer relevant.
  24. Of course he does. And then he would get nothing. Deserves and gets are not necessarily related.
  25. Had he done that he would have immediately been closed down and most probably lost the ball.
×
×
  • Create New...