Whitey Grandad

That wouldn't be my list and London wouldn't be on it either.

http://www.thefa.com/~/media/files/pdf/fa-competitions-1314/fa-cup/fa-cup-rules-2013-2014.ashx. Section 21 Basically 15% of the accommodation issued.

Yep, net proceeds in the 3rd 4th 5th & 6th rounds. The 10% goes to the FA pool to be shared amongst the league clubs later. If one of the teams is non-league then it is 50:40:10 with the 50 going to the non-league team. Replays are 47.5 : 47.5 : 10 : 5 with the 5 going to the FA. http://www.thefa.com/~/media/files/pdf/fa-competitions-1314/fa-cup/fa-cup-rules-2013-2014.ashx. Section 22 refers to proceeds. Section 21 ticket allocations.

Much higher than that, I'm fairly certain. The plot is already serviced, of course.

Thanks, I normally only look at the pictures and don't normally get past the third page.

I'm afraid it won't. Supply and demand doesn't apply in many cases and this is one of them. Building costs are rising all the time. High-rising, in fact.

Where's Dalek? MLT said the same about Hoddle.

Nice, but no prices given for that development. I see they will have a communal pool/bath/toilet.

This made me laugh:

Interest, but horrifying at the same time. All right for some but not for me. (Brownfields are more expensive than green ones)

Hmm.. I hope it's not how to come for crosses or how to stop goals at your near post

6% is a hell of a lot. Add on all the other constructions as well. Look again at the most densely populated countries list, then restrict your search to just England. We can't move and we can't breathe.

Well, I did as you suggested and watched it. What a load of claptrap, I have never seen such flawed logic since Ponzi schemes started. The left column has the same cost but the top has global depression and the bottom has a smiley face, it's the same cost so you should expect the same outcome, you idiot, (I kept shouting at the screen). He also assumes that taking action is going to make a difference, which it won't, and that there's no ice age hovering around the next corner. Add in global depression to the bottom left and the only box with a smiley is the top right. The debate has many degrees of complexity and simplistic logic such as this reminds me of the Bible classes when I was a kid. Thanks for posting the link, if anything it confirms my beliefs.

There's no room, the country's bursting at the seams already.

I've just tried the website on my wife's Nexus 7 and it's ok, it switches to the mobile version which at first sight seems better than the desktop one.

None of these affect the calculations in item #5. And some of the items in this list are laughable.

That's because they've all flooded into Britain. If we build millions of cheap housing then we'll be an even bigger people magnet.

Was Webb on the list of approved refs that we submitted with our letter of complaint?

That is not the measure used in the UK.

Yes, we will miss him. On the other hand, he won't score against us in three weeks time.

Not really, the more you build the more demand you create. If you build them they will come.

I may be wrong but I don't think they can all do it at the same time. You may need to make an appointment.

Saintsfc.co.uk has a mobile version which it will auto-detect and maybe it's not compatible with you. Basically, it just doesn't like you You must be running under Android so you should be able to get the Saints app from the Google Playstore. I don't use it myself but I believe there's a free version or £0.99 for the ad-free one. I'm sure others on here have some experience of it.

I blame the parents.

But that's not how it is defined by those making the most out of it. If you use your measure then you'll find that the problem is much smaller than it's made out to be.