Barry the Badger

http://www.penaltychargenotice.co.uk/parking/contraventions-for-parking/contravention-code-27/ Still a bit vague.

It was a bit hard to work out, was it 3 Tadanari Lee's followed by the sushi line? Tadanari Lee Tadanari Lee Tadanari Lee (slightly different tune) Got him on a free and he eat's sushi,,, repeat. That right?

The whole thing is prefaced with "at the same time". It only applies to programmes broadcast online or anywhere else at the same time as on TV. From the link I posted. "You do not need a television licence to catch-up on television programmes in BBC iPlayer, only when you watch or record at the same time (or virtually the same time) as it is being broadcast or otherwise distributed to the public" The issue is that there are a lot of people who watch TV but don't pay the licence, which leads the BBC to aggressively pursue people who genuinely do not watch TV.

I'm not. That only applies to things being broadcast live online... "at the same time (or virtually the same time) as the programmes are being broadcast". You can use iplayer without a licence, and the same goes for the BBC website. http://iplayerhelp.external.bbc.co.uk/help/playing_tv_progs/tvlicence

Good for you. My point was, Wade was suggesting that the licence fee covers you to use the BBC website or iplayer. It doesn't, you can use them without one.

Anybody in the world can go on their website, I don't see any of the international users paying the BBC licence fee.

I thought the atmosphere was the best for a while, very good.

I don't really get the Pompey are cheats thing. Surely if you believe that Pompey's overspending was cheating, it follows that we were also cheats, albeit to a lesser extent.

Stopped as in "whats that, oh sorry its not a fag carry on", or stopped as in made to stop using it?

Yes I do. Apart from the cringy bit where they let a fan ask the man of the match a question.

Would've taken that before the match. At 1-0 down when they went down to 10 it's a decent result.

Well I typed "woot girl" into search engine and this came up, so what the hell.

Time to get Hammond on for Cork

Hate saying it but he's done a great job at Spurs, and did a great job down the road. I don't think we have any better candidates.

Yeah what an idiot, he started chopping and changing players at Bristol City away when he brought Chaplow off after 10 minutes and he's been at it ever since. He dropped Lallana, then Fonte, then he brought Lallana back in , and at one point he even dropped Lallana, Fonte and Lambert all for the same match! Now he keeps leaving Jos out but I bet he will change it again and bring him back in soon. Come on Adkins, if it aint broke, don't fix it.

You need to get out more. Hopefully the fact you snapped your disk out and snapped it like an idiot will enable you to do so.

But is it not massively inconsistent for that to be the case?

I've heard this mentioned a lot, but there were plenty of other games played in equally dodgy weather yesterday that weren't on sky.

I appreciate that, but is it not a little inconsistent that from a football perspective, Terry is being tried on a "beyond reasonable doubt" basis while Suarez was tried on a "balance of probability" basis?

They're also wildly inconsistent. It does get at me those bloody scousers always moaning but in this instance I think they have a point. John Terry, subject to criminal charges, so the FA won't investigate. If Terry is found not guilty as it cannot be proved beyond reasonably doubt they will say that it has been dealt with by a higher power. Luis Suarez, not subject to criminal charges so the FA investigate and find him guilty on the balance of probability. Hmmmm.

I was trying to remember who made that "Strikers win you games, defenders win you championships" quote, thinking it was fairly apt for this thread and assuming it was somebody successful, Shankley perhaps, or Ferguson. Unfortunately upon searching it turns out it was John Gregory.

This is the most interesting argument ever. FWIW he was signed in December.

Glad to see a few others didn't think all the pens were "nailed on". If you had asked me during the match I would've said so of course, but having looked again in the cold light of day.... The way I sometimes try to reflect on reffing decisions after the match is think how would I feel if the teams were reversed... Lambert - I would be massively annoyed if a pen like that was given against Saints. Lallana foul - Would've accepted that one. Handball - Would be a bit ****ed off as have seen players get away with those, but also annoyed with our player for flapping his arms around in the box. Davis- Would have thought the opposition were whinging about nothing. That said, I shouted for all of them at the time and was raging that the Lambert one wasn't given... :-)

Adkins said post match that he was wary of us getting hit on the counter so we had to be a bit more conservative. Would imagine the full-back were simply doing as they were instructed so as not to leave us exposed.

I want to put my fist through my monitor every time my colleague says Atkins. Davies is his other favourite.