Jump to content

wild-saint

Members
  • Posts

    2,590
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by wild-saint

  1. The Shaw sub made me laugh because whilst the ass ref was inputting the sub numbers into hos board the saints coach shouted to shaw and gestured for him to go to the touchline on the far side prior to the number being raised.
  2. i heard that thier credit cards were declined at the ticket office and to save face they banded around the story about car parking charges
  3. and that is the crux of the problem at saints. both our current first choice cbs need a strong dominant ( particularly in the air) partner who will lead and marshall the back four.
  4. hmm gotbthem prmoted but didnt have a great start, why does that sound familiar?
  5. the waybyou bleat on i was sure you thought on fridaybwecwere by far the worst team in the division
  6. nice to see that alpine hasnt posted yet
  7. out of imterest other than myself of courser, who are the top 3 posters who should be place on the ignore list ?
  8. apart from Saints IMO
  9. i stand by comments on alpine that i got an in infraction for this morning. blantant trolling in every thread again mods. still spineless i see
  10. oh dear crying an whinnying like a girl. 2 separate infractions for the same insult. Well done mods, great work. I take it you forgot about the blantant trolling being against the rules as well? chuffing spineless
  11. k and that my friend is the point being missed by the adkins out at all costs brigade. a couple of canny signings in defence early january and we will have a really decent side. the second half of the season is our chance to stay in the prem with adkins. i think we will be discussing adkins loyalty about whether he should take that bigger job. oh the irony.
  12. with the players we have available, what formation would you play that ultimately changes our side into a winning team? im not sure we anyone would be able to do much with the back four and as such is pretty pointless to make a change. a couple of decent defenders sigend in january and the side would look far more balanced and far better than bottom 3 material imo. the question is whether NC has an itchy trigger finger. personally id keep adkims for the entire season regardless of results as i feel the team is in transition as it evolves into a prem side. i just hope we stay in touch untill jan.
  13. how utterly embarassing ? although to be fair the senior players playing tonight will hopefully get no game time in the first team at all this season. saying that guly will obviously get a game from the bench if we take the lead in a game
  14. is lee playing? i dont hink his name has been mentioned on the radio at all?
  15. im friends with LEs Reeds PA but unfortunately she wont even tell us what he has in his sandwiches let alone any juicy gossip
  16. well our season would be over if that happend
  17. interesting that he is wrong because he had achieved wuth a high budget, does that not equally apply to adkins? for what its worth i think we should make a decision today and stick with it. Nc needs to stick or twist but not dawdle for weeks until change is too late. i would keep until the end of the season regardless personally but if he does feel a change is the right move do it know to give the max chance of success.
  18. Im not sure if its lack of premier league experience more like premier league ability. across the whole back 5 i would struggle to suggest any are premier league quality at the moment. Thats not to say they wont be ( clyne and gazza have potential) but foe me fox, jos and fonte are a little out of thier depth.
  19. i am after a saints programme from a few seasons back, i dont suppose anyone can suggest a suitable retail outlet where i may find one?
  20. i dont think many of that team are england class. what does that tell you?
  21. shyte i cant find the rolley eye thing
  22. i thought andy caroll did well when hevcame on.
  23. why, we have been scoring goals without him. its conceding them that is the issue.
  24. this post in itself is proof that you make stuff up to suit your whines and whinges. "clearly on for promotion barring an act of god". when did you ever once post anything remotely close to stating that your opinion was that we would be promoted barring an act of god? what a complete to55er you are. thats the funniest thing you have ever written.
  25. oh come on, yoshida is a left footed centre back playing at right back. he has no right foot other than to balance on. imo he did ok defending although offered nothing going foward and gave the ball away with his right quite often. filled in ok. jay rod imo is far happeir and better in the middle amd started to get some confidence back. chappers came on to double up when richardson came on and was ok. taking off sir rickie just invited fulham to kick on and wasbthe faux pas of the decade. you could see it a mile off that they would get back in the game after he went off.
×
×
  • Create New...