Clearly he doesn't do any research and there is no editorial input so it's a bit of a shambles really. He appears to bang it out in half an hour based on watching Match of the Day.
I would be genuinely interested to know what sort of fee is involved.
Rugby and football are very different.
Tossers excepted, a bunch of people can have a decent game of footy without a ref.
You can't really play rugby without a ref. Rugby necessarily appeals to official intervention or it can't work.
That said, it always puzzles me why the professional football game tolerates dissent to the level it does. If referees booked everyone who shouted at them or the lino aggressively or shouted "**** off" every time a decision is given then that sort of behaviour would leave the professional game and there ought to be a trickle down of respect to youth / amateur level.
He's saying the law is silly, which it probably is. If your feet are level but your head happens to be tilted beyond the last defender then you are offside. That seems silly.
We'll be fine then as the teams below us, by your brilliant logic, will do exactly what their prior results this year suggest as well, which will be worse than us.