benjii

Let him in!

Quite simply, if you ban people for exhibiting wit or flair, you end up with a bunch of humourless twonks regurgitating the same tired points over and over...

Exactly.

They are directed at the management team. You can't pass the buck. This is a stupid decision that has made the forum much worse.

Absolutely.

Just admit it's a stupid decision, that only someone with a sense of humour bypass and an over-inflated sense of importance would make, and we'll say no more about it.

Exactly!

Deppo hardly spammed the threads though. If anything he made them more readable. Ridiculous, jobsworth, pretentious nonsense to ban him.

What you busy with that weekend, Ben?

And has Deppo been banned? FFS. Seriously. FFS.

FFS. Seriously. FFS.

You apologise and tell them that if they wish to cancel their membership as a result of the changes you will refund them pro rata for the remainder of their membership year. I'd be more worried about losing the already paid up members who are expressing concerns about the way this place is run and operated than of losing the number (seriously, how many, 1, 2?) of people who would genuinely be annoyed enough to quit on the basis of those changes.

Glory Murp.

Plus another. I'm all for banning people who are clearly intent on doing nothing other than post contrary views for the sake of getting a rise (Scooby - laughably not banned for months). Banning people for funny or sarcastic posts is stupid though. That is a feature of the kaleidoscope of human discourse. FFS. Another problem is the profligacy of pointless and sparsely populated sub-forums which discourage and hinder participation. There should be a Saints forum, an away forum, an overseas Saints forum and a general chat board. That's all. Also, I agree that anyone should be able to start a thread.

The cheating ho' bag...

Site Suggestions....!!! Site ****ing Suggestions!!! No one reads Site Suggestions. FFS.

This this has been posted on here before (and it's a long read but well worth it if you have a spare 30 minutes or so!) http://www.419eater.com/html/bigman.htm

But I like some of them.

A "Talib", more than one "Taliban". Don't thank me. I impart wisdom for free.

Actually, now I've read that I can see it's exactly the same. Sorry pfc123, I was wrong and you're a bit of a legend.

FFS - do we have to see this? Even if it is actually something that looks like an old person's shaft and ring and not an actual wrinkly wiener and poop-chute.

Gasmi?

pfc123 - I might explain it to you tonight if I can be bothered.

Except that Sheffield to Nottingham is the equivalent of Saints to Reading. 2,200 is not "about right" - it's bloody good.

Pretty sure you did say that someone from Germany was coming along with loads of cash though. There was some ******** about Chinese investment too. Either way, you appear a ****.