badgerx16

As SAF would put it "Southampton are the best team to play at St Mary's this season".

Obviously a training ground move that didn't work 'live'. Don't think we'll see it again.

Think J-Rod paid the price for the Villa dive.

Having watched the game midweek, I 4-1 hold the opinion that that is a very poor imitation of a Brazil team.

is this her ?

Correct- so why spunk away the PPs on players they shouldn't have had instead of making it available to the CVA 9 months ago ? Particularly when for the last few months they've been effectively operating at a loss.

1.3 per game until the end of the season takes us to 41, which should be enough. This was MY point.

But this is not a circumstance that falls within the FL's rules. This is a one-off ruling specific to portsmouth FC - and they cannot continue in admin beyond April 30th.

Yes, but were using the PPs as their guarantee that the money would actually be paid back. If they loosen this security, their risk increases.

I think with the Local Government spending cuts, the Council will need to be very careful how it balances this 'loan' against closing care homes and libraries.

Any team's 'last 3' results could look poor when 2 of them are away, one of them @ OT. In all 3 we didn't play at all badly, and with 'rub of the green' the 2 points could have been 7. I'm confident that the 'last 15' form is indicative of how we are performing.

She lives on SunnyBrook farm.

They have their own special category - they are not so much 'emergency' loans as 'critical on life support' loans.

Presumably that's Southsea Common ?

"In the event the PST bid does not succeed and Portsmouth do not exit administration before the end of the current playing season, the club will lose its membership of the Football League." My reading of this is that whilst the PST ( PDT ? ) are 'preferred' they are the only bunch the FL will deal with. If ( when ? ) that falls through then another bid can be put forward. The only issue with that could be how much time is left before June 30th. How many times can the court hearing be adjourned ?

About as far as I live from her.

Weren't Seymour Pierce asked by Andy Android, as administrator of CSI, to sell PFC at the end of 2011 ? Then there was this last year, : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/9367251/Seymour-Pierce-set-to-be-sold-to-former-Soviet-company.html ( Seems to be a familiar theme )

2 defeats in 10 doesn't look too bad. #pedant Also, why are these points 'lost' ? You start the game at 0-0, so theoretically 1 point gained over where you are before the game, but you don't improve this to the 3 for a win until the final whistle. You cannot lose what you never had. /#pedant

But don't the political parties present their manifestos to outline their legslative program, and expect us to decide based on the promises ( bribes ) they might be offering ? The fact is that this Act was not in any manifesto, and the tax break was.

Yes, but all these soon to be newly married couples surely deserve to benefit as well ?

Well, I suppose a Government that nobody voted for doesn't have any promises to keep.

And where's the promised tax break for married couples ? That WAS in the manifesto, unlike this new bit of legislation.

So does this now mean that hetero couples can get a Civil Partnership ?

The truth hurts.