Problem is, so far this season you could have said similar things about Thompson, Gobern, Robertson, Pekhart, Holmes, Smith etc etc.
They come in, play a good game or two, then get ditched.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it was a good idea. I think the whole idea of trying to prop up the share price is stupid, especially for an illiquid stock like SLH where there are few shareholders.
I wouldn't resign if I was him. He'll never get another job as big as this one, no matter how crappy it is at the minute. I'd be in no hurry to go back to managing in front of 300 fans in Holland.
I think we drew ourselves into a bit of a corner with Dyer.
We never seemed all that keen to keep him, but at the same time we didn't want to lose him for nothing. So we offered him a contract in the hope that we'd get some tribunal cash when he went elsewhere. But he couldn't find another club so ended up signing for us, and we are now stuck with a player who probably doesn't want to be here and the feeling appears to be mutual.
I can see us letting him go for free in the summer, and this little gamble could have cost us several hundred thousand.
I'm sure they do, but it was never their money they were planning on putting in was it? Hence all the comments of 'we'll have the cash any day now'.
Face facts, the credit crunch/recession has put paid to any potential takeover. We are screwed, the only consolation is that other clubs are likely to be in the same boat as us.
Think of it the other way round. If we brought a player in on loan, we'd expect him to be here the next day and to be in contention for the next match.
It shouldn't really be any different for Dyer, except I think that Saints don't really want him around so aren't rushing him to come back.
If those highlights are a fair reflection of the chances in the game, then I'd say we were pretty lucky to get anything out of the match.
Our defending is embarrassing to watch. Wasn't Jan a defender?