Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Lives at home with his parents - apparently Doesn't have a pot to **** in - apparently Can someone please explain why it's a fake bid? Who has anything to gain from a hoax? It just doesn't add up or am I just being simple? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arizona Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Just checked and nope, there are no other threads on Fialka. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arizona Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Because I'm so nice, I've unlocked this thread, but you guys better have some f**king good answers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpturner Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Lives at home with his parents - apparently Doesn't have a pot to **** in - apparently Can someone please explain why it's a fake bid? Who has anything to gain from a hoax? It just doesn't add up or am I just being simple?You cannot fake £500k so where did it come from? It was always a sum of money that could potentially be lost, so somebody somewhere must have been able to afford to write it off if need be. I would have to be worth a shed load of cash to be able to chuck £500k down the drain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dog Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 If he still lives at home with his mum & dad, he must be loaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exit2 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Lives at home with his parents - apparently Doesn't have a pot to **** in - apparently Can someone please explain why it's a fake bid? Who has anything to gain from a hoax? It just doesn't add up or am I just being simple? I spoke to Um this evening trying to fathom out what Pinnacle would achive by being chancers. 1. They have proved funds 2. Gained an exclusive period with the administrators 3. Completed Due Diiligance 4. Created a board of directors which has been approved by the FL 5. Proved funds to the FL 6. Admitted talking to Keegan 7. Introduced some guy that it seems was very easy to find information out about. 8. Been semi open about there issues with regard to the FL 9. Mark Fry even said he was on their side last week So please can someone tell me why this is waste of time and a hoax, as I dont get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alain Perrin Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_Trethewy Same ****, different decade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exit2 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_Trethewy Same ****, different decade? Spencer Day as he is now called is a multi millionaire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Give it to Ron Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I spoke to Um this evening trying to fathom out what Pinnacle would achive by being chancers. 1. They have proved funds 2. Gained an exclusive period with the administrators 3. Completed Due Diiligance 4. Created a board of directors which has been approved by the FL 5. Proved funds to the FL 6. Admitted talking to Keegan 7. Introduced some guy that it seems was very easy to find information out about. 8. Been semi open about there issues with regard to the FL 9. Mark Fry even said he was on their side last week So please can someone tell me why this is waste of time and a hoax, as I dont get it That is what most of us can't fathom out and MF being on SSN ok great for 5 minute laugh with his mates but when that's gone how will he be thought of? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 4. Created a board of directors which has been approved by the FL Don't recall that being 'announced'....any idea who's on it? Lynam Le Tissier Fialka??? ? ? cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John B Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Don't recall that being 'announced'....any idea who's on it? Lynam Le Tissier Fialka??? ? ? cheers Crouch I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
derry Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I spoke to Um this evening trying to fathom out what Pinnacle would achive by being chancers. 1. They have proved funds 2. Gained an exclusive period with the administrators 3. Completed Due Diiligance 4. Created a board of directors which has been approved by the FL 5. Proved funds to the FL 6. Admitted talking to Keegan 7. Introduced some guy that it seems was very easy to find information out about. 8. Been semi open about there issues with regard to the FL 9. Mark Fry even said he was on their side last week So please can someone tell me why this is waste of time and a hoax, as I dont get it Everything adds up but something has happened to change things because the administrator doesn't see it happening with Pinnacle. The reason for not completing doesn't stack up. They have said they are going to buy the club then why not buy it and continue the negotiations with the league. Unless I am wrong which is always likely, they have the money and they aren't going to blink until the club is 10 minutes from liquidation hoping the league blinks first, as there are no other takers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I spoke to Um this evening trying to fathom out what Pinnacle would achive by being chancers. 1. They have proved funds 2. Gained an exclusive period with the administrators 3. Completed Due Diiligance 4. Created a board of directors which has been approved by the FL 5. Proved funds to the FL 6. Admitted talking to Keegan 7. Introduced some guy that it seems was very easy to find information out about. 8. Been semi open about there issues with regard to the FL 9. Mark Fry even said he was on their side last week So please can someone tell me why this is waste of time and a hoax, as I dont get it Good post Exit. There is no logical reason why anyone would go to these lengths without being serious about buying the club. I think that some posters on this forum need to look at this situation from a logical, reasoned standpoint. Some of the theories being put forward are laughable such as Pinnacle have no money - To complete due dilligance they would have had to prove that the funds were available. Or that this is an elaborate hoax - The Hitler Diaries were a hoax. Cost= £0. So far Pinnacle have stumped up about £1million. Now as much as I'd like to pull off a legendary hoax, I certainly wouldn't be willing to spunk that kind of money to do it. It has been hinted that the money is coming from MF's 'community', because MF has serious connections within the Jewish community. This seems a likely scenario to me. The hatchet job being perpetrated by members of this forum and the lazy journalists at the Echo has managed to create a frenzy that is beginning to border on the vitriolic. There is even a slight undertone of anti semitism creeping in. I find this bitterly disappointing and it makes me ashamed of some of my fellow fans. I want us to be united for the first time in years but I am beginning to think that this isn't possible. I truly hope that this deal happens and happens real soon; not because I want to see egg on the faces of the naysayers but because I WANT MY CLUB BACK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Author Share Posted 26 June, 2009 So far Pinnacle have stumped up about £1million. Have they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Have they? I've seen no evidence of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Have they? Didn't exclusivity 'cost' £500k? Add on lawyers fees, bean counters fees etc for the last 4 weeks.... That has got to be getting for for £1million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Didn't exclusivity 'cost' £500k? Add on lawyers fees, bean counters fees etc for the last 4 weeks.... That has got to be getting for for £1million. Depends who you believe.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Author Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Didn't exclusivity 'cost' £500k? Add on lawyers fees, bean counters fees etc for the last 4 weeks.... That has got to be getting for for £1million. But we don't yet know who stumped up the £500K for exclusivity. I've asked for this question to be answered by TL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Depends who you believe.... Please elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Wolf Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Bottom line- If MLT trusts him, so do I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 But we don't yet know who stumped up the £500K for exclusivity. I've asked for this question to be answered by TL. Pinnacle paid. We know that for a fact because they had exclusivity for 3 weeks. Or are you inferring that someone paid the money to Pinnacle for exclusivity in return for involvement with the bid? If that is the case, what is the problem? Who is paying the lawyers and bean counters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VectisSaint Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Depends who you believe.... True, do I believe a respected accountancy firm acting as Administrators, MLT and TL, or do I believe someone who posts on a message board. Duh, difficult one that. Please try to understand that no-one could get this far without the funds existing, and no-one would **** £1mill against a wall just to pull off a hoax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exit2 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Depends who you believe.... Only got to look at your facebook comments to relise where your getting your info from. I get on well with the bloke you talk to but I have told him that because of the "sauce" of his information I take it with a pinch of salt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Author Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Bottom line- If MLT trusts him, so do I Is MLT aquainted with TL or the mystery londoners? My understanding is that TL got Matt involved and the money men are down to TL. Therefore MLT may well trust Tony, but many people also trusted Jacko in the past. I'm purely playing devils advocate with this ramble, but the point is anyone can be fooled by people with the gift of the gab. It happens all the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulSaint Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Mark Dennis stated on the radio about a week back that were two backers: A) someone a little bit well off (Fialka?) B) someone really, really well off (Unknown) I guess a few days back when they first saw the FL's "Goalpost changed" contract that "B" got cold feet and left the party. The so called "FL issues" are being rolled out each day to buy time while they run around try to find a replacement "B" and save face (plus the club). IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Is MLT aquainted with TL or the mystery londoners? My understanding is that TL got Matt involved and the money men are down to TL. Therefore MLT may well trust Tony, but many people also trusted Jacko in the past. I'm purely playing devils advocate with this ramble, but the point is anyone can be fooled by people with the gift of the gab. It happens all the time. But the question remains..... Why? Why do it? What does MF have to gain Mole? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trousers Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Only got to look at your facebook comments to relise where your getting your info from. I get on well with the bloke you talk to but I have told him that because of the "sauce" of his information I take it with a pinch of salt Ssshhh....I've been trying to keep my Facebook friendship with Rupert quiet for the time being....but, indeed....it still depends on whom one believes and whom one doesn't believe though....best keep an open mind I say... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Author Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Pinnacle paid. We know that for a fact because they had exclusivity for 3 weeks. Or are you inferring that someone paid the money to Pinnacle for exclusivity in return for involvement with the bid? If that is the case, what is the problem? Who is paying the lawyers and bean counters? I'm inferring nothing. I'm intrigued to know who stumped up the £500K given the conflicting rumours on here. Let's say Crouch paid the money - where does this leave the credibility of MF? Tony states that MF would be the sole owner of the club - i can just about go along with this if he has a rich uncle etc that wants to do him a favour (jewish and other immigrant families to do like to keep their business interests run by family members) but it would strike me as odd if MF's backer didn't pay the £500K and it would add weight to the question of their resolve to complete the purchase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wade Garrett Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I can't see this being a hoax. Fry has opened the bidding again because he is duty bound to. I think he is trying to force Pinnacle's hand and I don't blame him. Pre-season is upon us and things need to move quickly. The assassination of Fialka by the Echo is scandalous. I don't believe they know the full picture concerning him. The hypocrisy of them knows no bounds. Especially when they continue to be the mouthpiece for a proper bullsh*tter, Marc Jackson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guided Missile Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Is MLT aquainted with TL or the mystery londoners? My understanding is that TL got Matt involved and the money men are down to TL. Therefore MLT may well trust Tony, but many people also trusted Jacko in the past. I'm purely playing devils advocate with this ramble, but the point is anyone can be fooled by people with the gift of the gab. It happens all the time. The truth is, TL had contacts with some "Londoners with Money" and Andy H. put him in touch with Matt Le Tiss. All over a drink at the Lock, Stock and Barrel. The only problem for Tony and Matt is that they both got on the bus, and the gibbering nutter was the only ****ney left and he is sitting in the next seat, claiming he is a multi-millionaire, ex-professional footballer.... Crouch was driving the bus and I think he jumped off at the last stop.... Matt should do the same.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 The assassination of Fialka by the Echo is scandalous. The hypocrisy of them knows no bounds. Especially when they continue to be the mouthpiece for a proper bullsh*tter, Marc Jackson. Good Shout, you have to wonder about the Echo's motive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Author Share Posted 26 June, 2009 The hypocrisy of them knows no bounds. Especially when they continue to be the mouthpiece for a proper bullsh*tter, Marc Jackson. I think we can all agree on this point, regardless of which side we're on r.e Pinnacles authenticity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exit2 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 After my bullet points which I think give me personally a little bit of hope I have one question for those that are dissing / doubting / ridiculing Pinnacle. If the Swiss were in Pinnacles position would you all be saying the same thing if they were not completing. The reason I ask as I see most of this on here as desperation and are people just looking for a scape goat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 are people just looking for a scape goat? And some of those people, not fans as they couldn't possibly be, have looked toward MLT, SHAME ON THEM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CLOTH EARS Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Lives at home with his parents - apparently Doesn't have a pot to **** in - apparently Can someone please explain why it's a fake bid? Who has anything to gain from a hoax? It just doesn't add up or am I just being simple? Its probably something to do with a masonic plot to destroy the club? Maybe Faikka is in Lowes lodge??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Block 5 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 (edited) After my bullet points which I think give me personally a little bit of hope I have one question for those that are dissing / doubting / ridiculing Pinnacle. If the Swiss were in Pinnacles position would you all be saying the same thing if they were not completing. The reason I ask as I see most of this on here as desperation and are people just looking for a scape goat? Another pertinent question Exit. Surely the Swiss are in the same position as Pinnacle as indeed any potential buyer would be? The FL's contract would be the same for whoever wants to buy. Until we see the wording of the contract we can only speculate as to what hoops the League require us to jump through. Edited 26 June, 2009 by Block 5 Afterthought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulSaint Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 The assassination of Fialka by the Echo is scandalous. I don't believe they know the full picture concerning him. The hypocrisy of them knows no bounds. Especially when they continue to be the mouthpiece for a proper bullsh*tter, Marc Jackson. Did I read something on here stating that the sports editor is a Pompey Fan? If he is then spoiling our party & selling a few more papers must be fun for him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Author Share Posted 26 June, 2009 After my bullet points which I think give me personally a little bit of hope I have one question for those that are dissing / doubting / ridiculing Pinnacle. If the Swiss were in Pinnacles position would you all be saying the same thing if they were not completing. The reason I ask as I see most of this on here as desperation and are people just looking for a scape goat? I feel a lot of people have been like GM and put 2+2 together and deduced it's a hoax. MF doesn't appear to be wealthy and everyone has looked at this backed up by the typically sloppy journalism of the Echo and made their minds up. But just because MF may be relatively poor doesn't mean that a relative of his isn't loaded. As i mentioned in a previous post Jewish families like to keep business in the family - you can trust family members more than anyone else. If you look outside the box then maybe this bid has legs. Pinnacle have gone through due dilligence and they have proved their funds - i cannot get my head round how this could all have been fabricated. Perhaps GM could explain how it could have been and substantiate his claims of fraud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Chalet Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 (edited) The truth is, TL had contacts with some "Londoners with Money" and Andy H. put him in touch with Matt Le Tiss. All over a drink at the Lock, Stock and Barrel. The only problem for Tony and Matt is that they both got on the bus, and the gibbering nutter was the only ****ney left and he is sitting in the next seat, claiming he is a multi-millionaire, ex-professional footballer.... Crouch was driving the bus and I think he jumped off at the last stop.... Matt should do the same.... .... Edited 27 June, 2009 by St Chalet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guided Missile Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Perhaps GM could explain how it could have been and substantiate his claims of fraud. I would explain it, Stanley, but I can't be asked, TBH for two reasons. I have never claimed a fraud. You're an unpleasant piece of knob cheese. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I would explain it, Stanley, but [*]You're an unpleasant piece of knob cheese. The case for the defence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Author Share Posted 26 June, 2009 I would explain it, Stanley, but I can't be asked, TBH for two reasons. I have never claimed a fraud. You're an unpleasant piece of knob cheese. Translation: GM is stuck and it wouldn't fit his agenda to answer truthfully. Also you mentioned Fraud on a thread when the question was posed of LC stumping the £500K ...if I was Crouch I'd be calling in the fraud squad.... You disapoint me GM. You're quick enough to spout your opinions, but when you have to answer a reasonable question that doesn't suit your agenda you're tongue tied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guided Missile Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Also you mentioned Fraud on a thread when the question was posed of LC stumping the £500K Actually as I started the thread, how the f*** could the quote you provided be the answer to a question, as it was at the start of the thread. Actually, I'm off to have a brandy and then about two hours of sex.... ...I need a real life for a change, instead of an incessant battle of wits with unarmed posters... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exit2 Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Actually, I'm off to have a brandy and then about two hours of sex.... An hour with each hand Or you got a decent DVD to watch Sorry I couldnt resist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Author Share Posted 26 June, 2009 An hour with each hand Or you got a decent DVD to watch Sorry I couldnt resist Are you suggesting GM is a tosser? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole Posted 26 June, 2009 Author Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Actually as I started the thread, how the f*** could the quote you provided be the answer to a question, as it was at the start of the thread. So why would Crouch be needing to call in the Fraud squad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 call in the Fraud squad? He meant Police Squad Lynam - Well he's caucation. Crouch - Caucation? Lynam - Yeah, you know a white guy! Crouch - Oh... Lynam - He had a moustache, about 6ft 4. Crouch - That's an awfully big moustache! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arizona Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 He meant Police Squad Lynam - Well he's caucation. Crouch - Caucation? Lynam - Yeah, you know a white guy! Crouch - Oh... Lynam - He had a moustache, about 6ft 4. Crouch - That's an awfully big moustache! Matty: There's something going on St Mary's. Tony: What is it? Matty: A big stadium where they play football, but that's not important right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
INFLUENCED.COM Posted 26 June, 2009 Share Posted 26 June, 2009 Fry - Are you sure you'll be able to beat the other bidders tomorrow? Lynam - I can do it blindfolded! Fry - Well, what if there not blindfolded? Lynam- I can still take them! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nineteen Canteen Posted 27 June, 2009 Share Posted 27 June, 2009 MLT - Surely you can't raise the funds to buy the club. TL - Yes I can and don't call me Surely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now