Jump to content

Gobbern 4th midfielder


NickG
 Share

Recommended Posts

"and who will know what will happen with the transfer window"

 

Sounds to me that he is being given 6 weeks or so to prove his worth to the squad. He has been impressive at times but is injury prone. If he can sort that out, then he has got to be a better option than Wotton. If, come January he hasn't taken that chance, he'll be replaced/moved on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need a degree of physical presence to play centre mid. OG was played on the wing, as is Chambo right now even though he (Chambo) says he plays centre mid. Very few youngsters have the presence to play there, which is why, whatever his faults, people need to cut Morgan some slack. Gievn his age and experience to cut it there has he has speaks volumes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen him play, can't remember when, but thought he had potential and he did have a physical presence and height which seemed lacking in a lot of our youngsters. No problems with good small players but Gobern did seem to bring something else. Perhaps he'll not be so injury prone if he has finished growing and muscolo-skeletal problems no longer have the same impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen him play, can't remember when, but thought he had potential and he did have a physical presence and height which seemed lacking in a lot of our youngsters. No problems with good small players but Gobern did seem to bring something else. Perhaps he'll not be so injury prone if he has finished growing and muscolo-skeletal problems no longer have the same impact.

 

He played away to Preston two seasons ago when we came back to win from 2-0 down, set up the equaliser for Surman to nod home.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gW4aD9GSOng

 

15 seconds in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood why Gobern was played out wide. Quite clearly a central midfielder. Reminded me Carlton Palmer. Much rather see him on the bench than Wotton.

 

Going back to Adkins' comments about Puncheon, it doesn't add up. He didn't want to go, but Adkins left the door open. Why on earth would a manager allow a very decent reserve to leave unless he had to reduce costs? Managers always want good options off the bench and a large squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood why Gobern was played out wide. Quite clearly a central midfielder. Reminded me Carlton Palmer. Much rather see him on the bench than Wotton.

 

Going back to Adkins' comments about Puncheon, it doesn't add up. He didn't want to go, but Adkins left the door open. Why on earth would a manager allow a very decent reserve to leave unless he had to reduce costs? Managers always want good options off the bench and a large squad.

 

I honestly did not see it that way. I need to watch it again, but I thought NA stated Puncheon, did not ask to leave, but took the opportunity to do so when it was offered. I think NA seemed to imply that JP was not happy and that's why they gave him the option which he was happy to take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going back to Adkins' comments about Puncheon, it doesn't add up. He didn't want to go, but Adkins left the door open. Why on earth would a manager allow a very decent reserve to leave unless he had to reduce costs? Managers always want good options off the bench and a large squad.

 

NA clearly said words to the effect the Puncheon hasnt scored the goals he might have, and that he only wants players at Saints who want to be here. Puncheon decided to join Millwall on loan when they enquired. Add in the tension with Crosby and that all says to me NA isnt happy with Puncheons performance and Puncheon isnt happy to be advised on improving his game / criticised. Pucheon thinks he can do better elsewhere and NA thinks Saints can do better elsewhere. Maybe both are right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NA clearly said words to the effect the Puncheon hasnt scored the goals he might have, and that he only wants players at Saints who want to be here. Puncheon decided to join Millwall on loan when they enquired. Add in the tension with Crosby and that all says to me NA isnt happy with Puncheons performance and Puncheon isnt happy to be advised on improving his game / criticised. Pucheon thinks he can do better elsewhere and NA thinks Saints can do better elsewhere. Maybe both are right.

 

But you'd agree that if,and it's probably a big if, Puncheon does well at Millwall during the 10 weeks he'll be there initially then for some reason we didn't get the best out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But you'd agree that if,and it's probably a big if, Puncheon does well at Millwall during the 10 weeks he'll be there initially then for some reason we didn't get the best out of him.

 

I think he might well perform at Millwall, at least for a while. My sense is that he isnt much of a natural team player - maybe his social skills arent great. 7 clubs by the age of 24 tells us something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...