What Is Happening To Our Country?

[Whitey Grandad]

2 hours ago, rallyboy said:

The use of language is interesting, straight out of the Daily Mail handbook there, swarms, floods, plague, it's all very biblical and theatrical, to capture the imagination of one group of voters. 

The net migration figure of 171,000 from December 2025 is not a flood - but the word trickle doesn't fire up simpletons, and those wheely bins won't burn themselves.

When the tide comes in slowly it's still called a flood.

[Lord Duckhunter]

2 hours ago, rallyboy said:

The net migration figure of 171,000 from December 2025 is not a flood

The 10 years preceding Blair’s deliberate opening of the floodgates , net migration averaged 40k. We’re now led to believe 170k in little over 6 months isn’t a flood. 
 

It’s a ticking time bomb which people like you ignore in the rush to appear kind & moral. As we’ve seen time and time again, the “immigrant’s welcome” crew, really mean “immigrants welcome, just not where I live”. 
 

It can be done, look at Poland. Growing at 3.6% & unemployment at record lows. They’ve taken lots of genuine refugees fleeing Ukraine, but don’t take economic migrants pretending to be refugees. 

[rallyboy]

8 minutes ago, Lord Duckhunter said:

 

It’s a ticking time bomb which people like you ignore in the rush to appear kind & moral. As we’ve seen time and time again, the “immigrant’s welcome” crew, really mean “immigrants welcome, just not where I live”. 
 

 

Yeah, I'm always rushing to be kind and moral, it's my little thing that I like to do, though if you think I've forgotten that you fucked up and confused me with someone else, you're wrong.

As wrong as you were when you told us all that Boris was playing a blinder, when in reality he was a corrupt cunt who opened what I like to call floodgates - because that really was a flood.

 

[Farmer Saint]

The real floodgates opened with Brexit and the loss of the Dublin agreement, which we all knew couldn't be kept or replicated. That's it. If you voted for Brexit, this is what you've got.

[Farmer Saint]

1 hour ago, rallyboy said:

Yeah, I'm always rushing to be kind and moral, it's my little thing that I like to do.

 

Gosh, you must be a right cunt, being kind and moral. We want less people like you, and more like LD 😂

[ecuk268]

2 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said:

The real floodgates opened with Brexit and the loss of the Dublin agreement, which we all knew couldn't be kept or replicated. That's it. If you voted for Brexit, this is what you've got.

Ironically,  when we got back the ability to "control our borders" that the Brexiteers were always going on about, 2023 gave us the highest immigration figures at nearly 1.5m with a net figure of 950k. 

Getting that net figure down to 170k in 2 years is pretty good going.

[Gloucester Saint]

35 minutes ago, ecuk268 said:

Ironically,  when we got back the ability to "control our borders" that the Brexiteers were always going on about, 2023 gave us the highest immigration figures at nearly 1.5m with a net figure of 950k. 

Getting that net figure down to 170k in 2 years is pretty good going.

Yep, along with Boris’s sunlit uplands and his and Farage’s NHS red £350m bus, they voted for higher former Commonwealth immigration over EU economic and often temporary migration. 

Enjoy Brexiteers!

😂😂😂

Edited 20 hours ago by Gloucester Saint

[JohnnyShearer2.0]

People love to use Poland as an example of steady growth.

Conveniently forgetting the billions they've had over the years from the EU. They've used those funds well to build up infrastructure and all sorts. And being able to attract businesses and retain people.

However the cost of living is rising there and parties to the right want in and have started to gain traction. Wonder how that will square with the EU teat sucking.

[Osvaldorama]

21 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

If those people most concerned about the net migration figure were to leave, the figure would come down.

Replacing productive, concerned citizens with economic migrants, with questionable backgrounds doesn’t seem to be the smartest strategy. 

 

The times are reporting that 76% of the migrants given right to stay under EHCR are unemployed. 

Meanwhile loads of the millionaires and billionaires that generate actual GDP growth and progress for the country are leaving   

I mean.. wtf are we doing here 
 

 

[egg]

38 minutes ago, Osvaldorama said:

Replacing productive, concerned citizens with economic migrants, with questionable backgrounds doesn’t seem to be the smartest strategy. 

The times are reporting that 76% of the migrants given right to stay under EHCR are unemployed. 

Meanwhile loads of the millionaires and billionaires that generate actual GDP growth and progress for the country are leaving   

I mean.. wtf are we doing here 
 

I'm not sure what you think we're doing, or what we can do.

You (and others) talk as though we've built a sea creating an open path to our door, that we've sent people to northern France, handing out leaflets proclaiming the milk and honey available in the hotels of Hastings and Blackpool, and left dinghies behind so that people can flock here and enjoy all that's on offer. 

Nobody, I mean nobody, is stopping people wanting to leave certain countries, stopping people making money by popping them in a boat, and sending them into open waters. 

Like it or not, this will happen. All we can do is make ourselves less attractive a destination, accommodate anyone seeking asylum as cheaply as possible, and process them as quickly as we can. 

It would be a more productive discussion if the people whining about this issue could offer any thought through thoughts on the solution, rather than the "make the lefties who want them here pay extra" and "it's all Starmer's fault" bollox that people write. 

[badgerx16]

1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said:

Meanwhile loads of the millionaires and billionaires that generate actual GDP growth and progress for the country are leaving   

 

Then again perhaps not.....

https://taxjustice.net/2025/07/24/the-myth-busters-guide-to-the-millionaire-exodus-scare-story/

 

[badgerx16]

Another Brexit bonus ? Police and Border Force say they can't readily access criminal records on the other side of the channel.......

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clye9zn0y1ro

"A convicted people smuggler, once described as "the godfather" of the French migrant camps, is living in Leicestershire and believed to be seeking asylum while working illegally, a BBC investigation can reveal.

Twana Jamal was given a five-year jail sentence in France in 2016, where authorities described him as one of the most successful people smugglers ever caught.

Prosecutors said the Iraqi Kurd, aged 36 at the time, had earned up to £100,000 a week for moving illegal immigrants across the Channel.

Following a tip-off this year, we traced Jamal to the village of Blaby and witnessed him working, driving a car without a licence and apparently using a false name.

Jamal's presence in the UK raises serious concerns about whether existing border controls are effective in checking asylum seekers who have committed serious crimes overseas."

 

How can the BBC find these people but the authorities can't ?

Edited 2 hours ago by badgerx16

[AlexLaw76]

4 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Another Brexit bonus ? Police and Border Force say they can't readily access criminal records on the other side of the channel.......

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clye9zn0y1ro

"A convicted people smuggler, once described as "the godfather" of the French migrant camps, is living in Leicestershire and believed to be seeking asylum while working illegally, a BBC investigation can reveal.

Twana Jamal was given a five-year jail sentence in France in 2016, where authorities described him as one of the most successful people smugglers ever caught.

Prosecutors said the Iraqi Kurd, aged 36 at the time, had earned up to £100,000 a week for moving illegal immigrants across the Channel.

Following a tip-off this year, we traced Jamal to the village of Blaby and witnessed him working, driving a car without a licence and apparently using a false name.

Jamal's presence in the UK raises serious concerns about whether existing border controls are effective in checking asylum seekers who have committed serious crimes overseas."

 

How can the BBC find these people but the authorities can't ?

And when they find them, we keep them (and pay for them)

[Weston Super Saint]

7 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

Another Brexit bonus ? Police and Border Force say they can't readily access criminal records on the other side of the channel.......

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clye9zn0y1ro

"A convicted people smuggler, once described as "the godfather" of the French migrant camps, is living in Leicestershire and believed to be seeking asylum while working illegally, a BBC investigation can reveal.

Twana Jamal was given a five-year jail sentence in France in 2016, where authorities described him as one of the most successful people smugglers ever caught.

Prosecutors said the Iraqi Kurd, aged 36 at the time, had earned up to £100,000 a week for moving illegal immigrants across the Channel.

Following a tip-off this year, we traced Jamal to the village of Blaby and witnessed him working, driving a car without a licence and apparently using a false name.

Jamal's presence in the UK raises serious concerns about whether existing border controls are effective in checking asylum seekers who have committed serious crimes overseas."

 

How can the BBC find these people but the authorities can't ?

Which is just bullshit and probably covering up for ineptitude.  Unless France has left Interpol, whose headquarters are in Lyon?

Edited 1 hour ago by Weston Super Saint

[badgerx16]

22 minutes ago, Weston Super Saint said:

Which is just bullshit and probably covering up for ineptitude.  Unless France has left Interpol, whose headquarters are in Lyon?

I think the issue is on-demand access to data as people are being processed. There are procedural routes for investigators but these involve form filling and submission to individual national forces rather than instantaneous results. The UK does not have access to the EU wide integrated Schengen Information System.

[Gloucester Saint]

13 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

I think the issue is on-demand access to data as people are being processed. There are procedural routes for investigators but these involve form filling and submission to individual national forces rather than instantaneous results. The UK does not have access to the EU wide integrated Schengen Information System.

I agree, although there’s still ample evidence to kick him out with a brief hearing and keep him out. Driving around without a licence, can deport him for that as well. 

[Turkish]

51 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

And when they find them, we keep them (and pay for them)

with his leadership, organisation and business management skills im sure he'll make an outstanding contribution to British society. Welcome Twana!!

[Weston Super Saint]

45 minutes ago, badgerx16 said:

I think the issue is on-demand access to data as people are being processed. There are procedural routes for investigators but these involve form filling and submission to individual national forces rather than instantaneous results. The UK does not have access to the EU wide integrated Schengen Information System.

Nope.

Quote

An encrypted Internet-based worldwide communications network allows Interpol agents and member countries to contact each other at any time. Known as I-24/7, the network offers constant access to Interpol's databases.^[26] While the National Central Bureaus are the primary access sites to the network, some member countries have expanded it to key areas such as airports and border access points. Member countries can also access each other's criminal databases via the I-24/7 system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpol

[AlexLaw76]

31 minutes ago, Gloucester Saint said:

I agree, although there’s still ample evidence to kick him out with a brief hearing and keep him out. Driving around without a licence, can deport him for that as well. 

Why would we do that when the standard of Chicken nuggets are sub-optimal in his home country. Human rights, innit

[Whitey Grandad]

37 minutes ago, AlexLaw76 said:

Why would we do that when the standard of Chicken nuggets are sub-optimal in his home country. Human rights, innit

The solution is simple. Make sure that our chicken nuggets are the worst in the world.

What do you mean, "They already are"?