Matthew Le God Posted yesterday at 17:38 Posted yesterday at 17:38 (edited) 1 minute ago, Turkish said: why did you edit your post removing the word "joke" 1 minute after i posted? Come on MLG just admit it, you know what you did, you realised you'd get pelters for it so edited it hoping no one would notice, sadly for you they did. Anyway, having beaten you once again i'll let the good folk of saintsweb carry on with the discussion and i'll see you once this latest lot of wounds have healed from another mauling. In what context do you think the word joke was used? Because time after time, you have shown yourself to not understand context. Edited yesterday at 17:38 by Matthew Le God
Turkish Posted yesterday at 17:38 Author Posted yesterday at 17:38 Just now, Matthew Le God said: So are you saying I won 2007 to 2010, or was that a draw? 🤔😉 Im not going to count when you sulked off for a while as there was no one to beat.
Matthew Le God Posted yesterday at 17:39 Posted yesterday at 17:39 Just now, Turkish said: Im not going to count when you sulked off for a while as there was no one to beat. It wasn't sulking and it was only 1 year, not 3. So what about the other 2 years? Did I win them, a draw or is it just you being bad at maths (again)?
Badger Posted yesterday at 18:22 Posted yesterday at 18:22 Have noticed that the MLG YouTube clip is from an account named Chocolate tampon, and last night Turkish posted one from a channel operating under the name of spasticballs. Not your alter egos by chance are they ? All in all I think we do rather well in toning down the user names on here.
egg Posted yesterday at 18:46 Posted yesterday at 18:46 1 hour ago, Matthew Le God said: Bullshit! Stop lying. You're a repeat offender mate. Poor form. 1
Sarnia Cherie Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 13 hours ago, Matthew Le God said: Did you watch the video or just read the title? The video has nothing to do with him being disgraced. That episode is from 2002, 11 years before he was arrested. I did watch the video for what it was worth. In 2002 we had no idea there was a dark side to Rolf Harris but we do now. I think you could have found many examples of 'Bouncing Back' without any mention of a convicted paedophile which most people would find insulting. 4
skintsaint Posted 12 hours ago Posted 12 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Sarnia Cherie said: I think you could have found many examples of 'Bouncing Back' without any mention of a convicted paedophile which most people would find insulting. Quite simple really to have done so. 1
Holmes_and_Watson Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 12 hours ago, egg said: You're a repeat offender mate. Poor form. I know MLG has a lot of previous form for amending his posts, after responses and reaction have already been given. But disappointing that this is only a couple of weeks after the last time. This, and the pretence that he hadn't, shows that he's clearly incapable of learning anything. It's one thing to disagree with someone on a forum. But something else, if they are just dishonest.
Sarnia Cherie Posted 11 hours ago Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, skintsaint said: Quite simple really to have done so. Exactly this. Gets the message across.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now